From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
khali@linux-fr.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494A5E6F.70505@movial.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081217213226.GA26832@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:49:46PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>> Ben Dooks wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>>>
>>>> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus of
>>>> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored, and is thus
>>>> unnecessary. This patch removes the return value for the remove function
>>>> stored in a platform_driver structure.
>>>>
>>>> For the files drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c and
>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c, the original return value was the value
>>>> of a variable storing the result of calling i2c_del_adapter. I have thus
>>>> also deleted the declaration and initialization of this variable. For the
>>>> other files, the return values were always 0.
>>>>
>>>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
>>>> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>>> I take it remove_new will eventually be renamed to remove once all
>>> the changes have been made?
>>>
>>> Unless there are any objections I'll add this to the merge list for
>>> the next window.
>> Please be careful since the drivers/base/ part has not been applied
>> yet, so I'm Cc:ing Greg now for his opinion.
>
> The more I think about it, the more I think it should not be changed,
> sorry. We should leave the return value and do something based on the
> value of it if we can.
Thanks for the reply, it's justifying the changes in the SGI SCSI controller driver :)
Dmitri
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-10 16:27 Julia Lawall
2008-12-16 19:57 ` Ben Dooks
2008-12-17 12:49 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-17 21:32 ` Greg KH
2008-12-18 14:30 ` Dmitri Vorobiev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=494A5E6F.70505@movial.fi \
--to=dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®