From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Mario Schwalbe <schwalbe@inf.tu-dresden.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide: Fix ata_id_has_dword_io to return DWORD I/O support properly
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:40:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081218224010.45e3ce55@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812182142.16533.bzolnier@gmail.com>
> OTOH the current patch is safe even for 2.6.28 (based on years of experience
> with the check that we had in IDE subsystem) and will fix some libata drivers
> (pata_legacy, pata_qdi and pata_winbond) to use dword IO on >= ATA-2 devices.
>
> [ In reality this a regression fix for IDE -> libata conversion as it is a
> huge performance improvement for the above mentioned DMA-less drivers. ]
The 32bit PIO support is already queued up and went to Jeff a while ago
so thats all in hand - its btw a big win on some suprising chipset cases
including Intel ICH chipsets.
> Jeff, I would like to merge it through IDE tree since the other patch depends
> on it but if you want to go ahead and push it to Linus earlier feel free to
> do it (or I can include it into the next IDE fixes pull request if you like).
Its still broken. You cannot use the version check for versions below 3.
I remain unconvinced we should be looking at it anywhere except specific
pure ISA cycle pass through hardware and thus it belongs as a helper for
those drivers not as ata_has_mumble stuff as its not ATA - eide_* maybe.
Doubly complicating it is the small detail that ATA1 devices don't
all respond to IDENTIFY in the first place....
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-18 14:18 Mario Schwalbe
2008-12-18 17:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-12-18 17:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-12-18 20:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-18 22:40 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2008-12-18 23:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-19 10:50 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-19 19:30 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-20 0:10 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-19 11:31 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-12-19 11:34 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-12-18 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-20 1:58 ` Robert Hancock
2008-12-20 13:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-12-22 20:16 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081218224010.45e3ce55@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwalbe@inf.tu-dresden.de \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®