From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH for -tip] irq: for_each_irq_desc() makes simplify
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:41:54 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081225214057.50F6.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081225213640.50F3.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > >
> > > looks good, but linux/irq.h cannot be included on all architectures. (for
> > > example s390 has no notion of 'hardirqs'). But we created linux/irqnr.h
> > > for this purpose - so including that should work better.
> >
> > Oh, thanks good explain.
> > I'll fix soon.
>
> next spin is here.
> I confirmed three architecture.
>
> 1. alpha (without SPARSE_IRQ, build test by cross compiler only)
> 2. ia64 (without SPARSE_IRQ)
> 3. x86_64 (with SPARSE_IRQ)
Is this good idea?
this patch also tested on above three architecture.
===
Subject: [PATCH] irq: for_each_irq_desc() makes simplify
Impact: cleanup
all for_each_irq_desc() usage point have !desc check.
then its check can move into for_each_irq_desc() macro.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c | 10 ----------
drivers/xen/events.c | 3 ---
fs/proc/stat.c | 3 ---
include/linux/irqnr.h | 6 ++++--
kernel/irq/autoprobe.c | 15 ---------------
kernel/irq/handle.c | 3 ---
kernel/irq/spurious.c | 5 -----
7 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -1400,8 +1400,6 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
/* Mark the inuse vectors */
for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
cfg = desc->chip_data;
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cfg->domain))
continue;
@@ -1783,8 +1781,6 @@ __apicdebuginit(void) print_IO_APIC(void
for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
struct irq_pin_list *entry;
- if (!desc)
- continue;
cfg = desc->chip_data;
entry = cfg->irq_2_pin;
if (!entry)
@@ -2425,9 +2421,6 @@ static void ir_irq_migration(struct work
struct irq_desc *desc;
for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING) {
unsigned long flags;
@@ -2713,9 +2706,6 @@ static inline void init_IO_APIC_traps(vo
* 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;)
*/
for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
cfg = desc->chip_data;
if (IO_APIC_IRQ(irq) && cfg && !cfg->vector) {
/*
Index: b/drivers/xen/events.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -142,9 +142,6 @@ static void init_evtchn_cpu_bindings(voi
/* By default all event channels notify CPU#0. */
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
desc->affinity = cpumask_of_cpu(0);
}
#endif
Index: b/fs/proc/stat.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -47,9 +47,6 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p,
steal = cputime64_add(steal, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.steal);
guest = cputime64_add(guest, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.guest);
for_each_irq_desc(j, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
sum += kstat_irqs_cpu(j, i);
}
sum += arch_irq_stat_cpu(i);
Index: b/kernel/irq/autoprobe.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/irq/autoprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/autoprobe.c
@@ -40,9 +40,6 @@ unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
* flush such a longstanding irq before considering it as spurious.
*/
for_each_irq_desc_reverse(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
if (!desc->action && !(desc->status & IRQ_NOPROBE)) {
/*
@@ -71,9 +68,6 @@ unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
* happened in the previous stage, it may have masked itself)
*/
for_each_irq_desc_reverse(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
if (!desc->action && !(desc->status & IRQ_NOPROBE)) {
desc->status |= IRQ_AUTODETECT | IRQ_WAITING;
@@ -92,9 +86,6 @@ unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
* Now filter out any obviously spurious interrupts
*/
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
status = desc->status;
@@ -133,9 +124,6 @@ unsigned int probe_irq_mask(unsigned lon
int i;
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
status = desc->status;
@@ -178,9 +166,6 @@ int probe_irq_off(unsigned long val)
unsigned int status;
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
status = desc->status;
Index: b/kernel/irq/handle.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -433,9 +433,6 @@ void early_init_irq_lock_class(void)
int i;
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
lockdep_set_class(&desc->lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
}
}
Index: b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
===================================================================
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -91,9 +91,6 @@ static int misrouted_irq(int irq)
int i, ok = 0;
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
- if (!desc)
- continue;
-
if (!i)
continue;
@@ -115,8 +112,6 @@ static void poll_spurious_irqs(unsigned
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
unsigned int status;
- if (!desc)
- continue;
if (!i)
continue;
Index: b/include/linux/irqnr.h
===================================================================
--- a/include/linux/irqnr.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqnr.h
@@ -22,11 +22,13 @@ struct irq_desc;
# define for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) \
for (irq = 0, desc = irq_to_desc(irq); irq < nr_irqs; \
- irq++, desc = irq_to_desc(irq))
+ irq++, desc = irq_to_desc(irq)) \
+ if (desc)
# define for_each_irq_desc_reverse(irq, desc) \
for (irq = nr_irqs - 1, desc = irq_to_desc(irq); irq >= 0; \
- irq--, desc = irq_to_desc(irq))
+ irq--, desc = irq_to_desc(irq)) \
+ if (desc)
extern struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-25 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-25 10:46 [PATCH for -tip] proc: remove ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ from stat.c KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-25 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-25 11:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-25 12:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-25 12:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-12-25 13:10 ` [PATCH for -tip] irq: for_each_irq_desc() makes simplify Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-25 13:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-25 14:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-25 14:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-25 16:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-26 1:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-26 9:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-25 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-25 14:46 ` [PATCH for -tip] proc: remove ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ from stat.c KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081225214057.50F6.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®