From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@infradead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mpparse.c fix style problems
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:23:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090104172319.GA1238@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f9a31f40901040917i52df1ef5i7d86ddee05d4d0b1@mail.gmail.com>
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Ingo,
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > i think it would be cleaner to rename all the the mpc->mpc_X fields to
> > mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site. (we already
> > know that it's an 'mpc' entity - no need to duplicate that in the field
> > too)
> >
>
> I send [PATCH -tip 0/7] x86 rename all fields mpc_X to X based on this.
>
> Currently I rename fields of few mpc_X structures from
> arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec_def.h. In this file struct
> intel_mp_floating is still remaining with mpf_X fields, Is this also
> need to be fixed ? if yes then mpf_intel name is OK ?
>
> Similarly in arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h :
> 1. struct mp_config_ioapic with mp_X fields (what name will be best ?)
> 2. struct mp_config_intsrc with mp_X fields
>
> These are also used in arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
>
> Please let me know should I fix mp_X things first or should I proceed
> further in mpparse.c as per your suggestions.
i think those should be standardized to mpc_X too, and the fields should
lose their mp_ prefix.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-04 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-31 11:38 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-02 17:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 17:51 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-02 18:19 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-04 17:17 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-04 17:23 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-04 17:34 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-08 14:43 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090104172319.GA1238@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jaswinder@infradead.org \
--cc=jaswinderlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®