From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:36:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090106093624.GA5061@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901052104400.16409@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:07:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:14:22PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Is this all sparc cross compiler? I'm trying to reproduce it on x86 with
> > > > > no avail :-(
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to test other ways to change the macro, but to do so, I need
> > > > > to get a compiler that will produce the warnings that you see. What
> > > > > version of gcc are you using?
> > > >
> > > > I used crosstool to build a 3.4.5 gcc:
> > >
> > > Hmm, that's a pretty old compiler. I wonder if it wouldn't just help
> > > if we just make the branch tracer dependent on the compiler used. That is.
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES) && (__GNUC__ >= 4)
> > > #define if(cond) ...
> > >
> > > Or something :-/
> >
> > FWIW, on s390 with gcc 4.3.2 and an allyesconfig I get these:
> >
> > CC arch/s390/mm/extmem.o
> > arch/s390/mm/extmem.c: In function 'segment_modify_shared':
> > arch/s390/mm/extmem.c:572: warning: 'end_addr' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > arch/s390/mm/extmem.c:572: warning: 'start_addr' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > arch/s390/mm/extmem.c: In function 'query_segment_type':
> > arch/s390/mm/extmem.c:259: warning: 'vmrc' may be used uninitialized in this function
> >
> > Switching off PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES makes the warnings go away again.
>
> Now that is really interesting. Because end_addr and start_addr are
> initialized via functions:
>
> if (x)
> init_me(a, &y);
> else
> init_me(b, &y);
>
> Which actually does not make sense why turning off PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
> would affect this :-/
They are not necessarily initialized via 'initme'. Only if it returns with
a return value >= 0. So it's a bit more complex:
if (x)
rc = init_me(a, &y);
else
rc = init_me(b, &y);
if (rc < 0)
/* y unitialized */
return;
use(y);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 18:19 Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 19:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:42 ` [PATCH] sparc: make proces_ver_nack a bit more readable Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:23 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 19:54 ` ftrace breaks sparc64 build Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 21:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 21:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 22:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-05 22:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 23:11 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 9:36 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2009-01-06 4:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 9:45 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-01-06 18:32 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-06 19:01 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 19:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 20:02 ` David Miller
2009-01-05 20:30 ` [PATCH] module: clean up initialization of variable Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 22:59 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-06 1:22 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-06 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 19:48 ` ftrace breaks sparc64 build Al Viro
2009-01-05 19:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 11:35 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 12:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 13:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 15:52 ` Al Viro
2009-01-06 18:39 ` David Miller
2009-01-08 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090106093624.GA5061@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome