mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* kbuild vs ccache
@ 2009-01-08  4:03 Roland McGrath
  2009-01-08  5:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2009-01-08  4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: linux-kernel


make clean; ccache -s > before-`git describe`; make -j9; ccache -s > after-`git describe`; diff -u {before,after}-`git describe`

v2.6.28:

-cache hit                         737661
-cache miss                        979624
-called for link                    78268
+cache hit                         738093		= +432
+cache miss                        980524		= +900
+called for link                    78289		= +21
 multiple source files                373
 compile failed                      5679
 preprocessor error                  1594
-not a C/C++ file                   44512
+not a C/C++ file                   44549		= +37

1332	cacheable
58	uncacheable


v2.6.28-7485-g9e42d0c:

-cache hit                         738096		= +9
+cache hit                         738105
 cache miss                        980524		= +0
-called for link                    78293
+called for link                    79659		= +1366
 multiple source files                373
 compile failed                      5679
 preprocessor error                  1594
-not a C/C++ file                   44549		= +1384
+not a C/C++ file                   45933

9	cacheable
2750	uncacheable


What changed?


Thanks,
Roland

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: kbuild vs ccache
  2009-01-08  4:03 kbuild vs ccache Roland McGrath
@ 2009-01-08  5:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2009-01-08  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roland McGrath; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:03:36PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> 
> make clean; ccache -s > before-`git describe`; make -j9; ccache -s > after-`git describe`; diff -u {before,after}-`git describe`
> 
> v2.6.28:
> 
> -cache hit                         737661
> -cache miss                        979624
> -called for link                    78268
> +cache hit                         738093		= +432
> +cache miss                        980524		= +900
> +called for link                    78289		= +21
>  multiple source files                373
>  compile failed                      5679
>  preprocessor error                  1594
> -not a C/C++ file                   44512
> +not a C/C++ file                   44549		= +37
> 
> 1332	cacheable
> 58	uncacheable
> 
> 
> v2.6.28-7485-g9e42d0c:
> 
> -cache hit                         738096		= +9
> +cache hit                         738105
>  cache miss                        980524		= +0
> -called for link                    78293
> +called for link                    79659		= +1366
>  multiple source files                373
>  compile failed                      5679
>  preprocessor error                  1594
> -not a C/C++ file                   44549		= +1384
> +not a C/C++ file                   45933
> 
> 9	cacheable
> 2750	uncacheable
> 
> 
> What changed?

Before we did a straight .c -> .o 
Now we do .c -> .s -> .o to mark __crc_ symbols static so we can
kill them when stripping modules.

It is already being discussed in another thread.
See "[REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc"

	Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-08  5:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-08  4:03 kbuild vs ccache Roland McGrath
2009-01-08  5:42 ` Sam Ravnborg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®