From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:03:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901081803.49632.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901081748.58962.oliver@neukum.org>
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Thursday 08 January 2009 17:36:12 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > We do support remote wakeup from PS2 keyboards. So you might argue we
> > > should do the same for USB HID devices.
> >
> > Well, _I_ can live with a few 'echo disabled > /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup'
> > lines in my init scripts, but I'm afraid we're going to get many problem
> > reports related to this. This means people will likely lose time on trying to
> > debug this problem and someone will have to handle the reports. Are you
> > volunteering to do that?
>
> You are making a very persuasive argument for reverting it.
> But what about laptops that only have a USB keyboard?
Well, up to and including 2.6.28 they needed to echo 'enable' to the USB
controllers' /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup files, so if the patch is reverted,
they won't be worse off than they were day before yestarday. :-)
Perhaps we can choose the default depending on whether or not any HID devices
are attached to given controller?
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-08 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-08 7:35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-08 8:49 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-01-08 16:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-08 16:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-01-08 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-01-08 18:55 ` Frans Pop
2009-01-08 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-09 15:55 ` Alan Stern
2009-01-09 17:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-09 22:23 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-12 21:53 ` Alan Stern
2009-01-12 22:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-13 3:10 ` Alan Stern
2009-01-13 11:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-09 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-09 10:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-01-09 10:36 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901081803.49632.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®