From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
drepper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] add rt_tgsigqueueinfo syscall [RESEND]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:44:24 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228024424.D237CFC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Michael Kerrisk's message of Saturday, 28 February 2009 14:53:23 +1300 <cfd18e0f0902271753ld9b432tae6c0ee783a24480@mail.gmail.com>
> With respect to the first point, it seems to me reasonably likely that
> there would be use cases where the receiving thread wants to know the
> thread ID of the sender -- especially when sender and receiver are in
> the same process.
But expecting si_pid to play that role is bizarre. It's never what any
POSIX-like program would do, both since POSIX says si_pid is a process ID,
and because there are no POSIX-like interfaces at all that use Linux TIDs
to refer to threads.
Wanting this only seems plausible within one process. In that case, sender
and recipient know they share memory. The normal thing to do (and what
POSIX applications will do) is to store that info somewhere pointed to by
the sigval.
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-28 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 13:35 Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 13:35 ` [patch 1/3] signals: split do_tkill Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 13:35 ` [patch 2/3] signals: implement sys_rt_tgsigqueueinfo Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 13:35 ` [patch 3/3] x86: hookup sys_rt_tgsigqueueinfo Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 21:19 ` [patch 0/3] add rt_tgsigqueueinfo syscall [RESEND] Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-26 22:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-28 1:53 ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-28 2:44 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2009-02-28 8:46 ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-27 0:03 ` Roland McGrath
2009-03-23 11:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-24 6:58 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090228024424.D237CFC3DA@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome