From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask work
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:00:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090315060044.GE20949@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903151326.34114.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
* Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 March 2009 01:57:42 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Note, it might have crashed in a cpu hotplug test i'm conducting
> > during bootup:
> >
> > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
>
> Indeed, thanks!
>
> Subject: cpumask: fix crash when offlining cpus
>
> Impact: Fix cpu offline when CONFIG_MAXSMP=y
>
> Changeset bc9b83dd1f66402b870301c3c7117b9c1484abb4 "cpumask: convert c1e_mask
> in arch/x86/kernel/process.c to cpumask_var_t" contained a bug: c1e_mask is
> manipulated even if C1E isn't detected (and hence not allocated). This is
> simply fixed by checking for NULL (which gcc optimizes out anyway of
> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n, since it knows ce1_mask can never be NULL).
>
> In addition, fix a leak where select_idle_routine re-allocates (and re-clears)
> c1e_mask on every cpu init.
>
> Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index cad5431..91a8c26 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -479,7 +479,8 @@ static int c1e_detected;
>
> void c1e_remove_cpu(int cpu)
> {
> - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, c1e_mask);
> + if (c1e_mask != NULL)
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, c1e_mask);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -556,8 +557,11 @@ void __cpuinit select_idle_routine(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> pm_idle = mwait_idle;
> } else if (check_c1e_idle(c)) {
> printk(KERN_INFO "using C1E aware idle routine\n");
> - alloc_cpumask_var(&c1e_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> - cpumask_clear(c1e_mask);
> + /* c1e_mask can only be NULL during boot of first cpu. */
> + if (c1e_mask == NULL) {
> + alloc_cpumask_var(&c1e_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
Sigh, there are two bugs here:
1) what if the GFP_KERNEL allocation fails?
2) this code is called with interrupts disabled, so a
GFP_KERNEL allocation can be lethal.
c1e_mask should stay a static cpumask...
Why do we convert static, standalone masks to cpumask_var?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-15 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 4:23 Rusty Russell
2009-03-12 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 22:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 0:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 2:46 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 3:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 4:34 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 4:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 5:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 5:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 6:44 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 13:12 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 13:45 ` [tip:cpus4096] cpumask: convert node_to_cpumask_map[] to cpumask_var_t Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 15:27 ` [PULL] x86 cpumask work Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 2:56 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-15 6:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-16 3:03 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-16 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 4:20 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-17 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 21:27 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-18 8:51 ` [tip:cpus4096] cpumask: fix CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y cpu hotunplug crash Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 13:13 ` [PATCH] Move numa_node_id default implementation to topology.h Rusty Russell
2009-03-13 13:45 ` [tip:cpus4096] numa, cpumask: move " Rusty Russell
2009-03-17 18:56 [PULL] x86 cpumask work Cliff Wickman
2009-03-17 21:52 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-18 12:57 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090315060044.GE20949@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome