From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MMC layer regression with single-block controllers
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:24:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090325172441.26e32fe3@mjolnir.ossman.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090325161425.GY27476@kernel.dk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1407 bytes --]
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:25 +0100
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25 2009, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> > The code was there previously, but it seemed a bit redundant to have
> > functionality like that in the block driver since we've already told
> > the block layer about the restrictions.
>
> You never saw the warnings? It's pretty clear that it does not support <
> PAGE_CACHE_SIZE blocks. It has always been so, I don't know why the
> subject says regression. I guess that is referring to a mmc layer
> regression?
>
Yes. The MMC code did all of this magic by itself previously and
assumed very little about the block layer.
> > The code was pretty simple. Basically it just cropped the sg list at
> > the correct place. Couldn't that be as easily done in the block layer?
>
> No, because if you do it transparently, then you have to keep partial
> state in the bio for completions. So it makes everything a lot more
> complex, I don't want to do that for something like this.
>
How is this different from the low level driver partially completing a
request, which is how it would have to be handled otherwise?
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-23 9:28 Manuel Lauss
2009-03-24 20:01 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-03-25 10:48 ` Manuel Lauss
2009-03-25 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-25 11:36 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-03-25 11:42 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-25 15:53 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-03-25 16:14 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-25 16:24 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2009-03-25 17:43 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090325172441.26e32fe3@mjolnir.ossman.eu \
--to=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®