From: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lcm@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix IRQ migration triggered active device IRQ interrruption
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:37:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090413193717.GB8393@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440904102346lfbc85f2w4508bded0572ec58@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:46:39PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:03:49PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> > Impact: Eliminates an issue that can leave the system in an
> >> > unusable state.
> >> >
> >> > This patch addresses an issue where device generated IRQs
> >> > are no longer seen by the kernel following IRQ affinity
> >> > migration while the device is generating IRQs at a high rate.
> >> > We have seen this problem happen when IRQ affinities are
> >> > adjusted in response to CPU offlining but I believe it
> >> > could also happen in during user initiated IRQ affinity
> >> > changes unrelated to CPU offlining. e.g. while the
> >> > irqbalance daemon is adjusting IRQ affinities when the
> >> > system is heavily loaded.
> >> >
> >> > I have been able to consistently reproduce the problem on
> >> > some of our systems by running the following script (VICTIM_IRQ
> >> > specifies the IRQ for the aic94xx device) while a single instance
> >> > of the command
> >> > # while true; do find / -exec file {} \;; done
> >> > is keeping the filesystem activity and IRQ rate reasonably high.
> >> >
> >> > #!/bin/sh
> >> >
> >> > SYS_CPU_DIR=/sys/devices/system/cpu
> >> > VICTIM_IRQ=25
> >> > IRQ_MASK=f0
> >> >
> >> > iteration=0
> >> > while true; do
> >> > echo $iteration
> >> > echo $IRQ_MASK > /proc/irq/$VICTIM_IRQ/smp_affinity
> >> > for cpudir in $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu[1-9] $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu??; do
> >> > echo 0 > $cpudir/online
> >> > done
> >> > for cpudir in $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu[1-9] $SYS_CPU_DIR/cpu??; do
> >> > echo 1 > $cpudir/online
> >> > done
> >> > iteration=`expr $iteration + 1`
> >> > done
> >> >
> >> > The root cause is a known issue already addressed for some
> >> > code paths [e.g. ack_apic_level() and the now obsolete
> >> > migrate_irq_remapped_level_desc()] where the ioapic can
> >> > misbehave when the I/O redirection table register is written
> >> > while the Remote IRR bit is set.
> >> >
> >> > The proposed fix uses the same avoidance method and much
> >> > of same code that the Interrupt Remapping code previously
> >> > used to avoid the same problem.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > Index: linux-2.6.30-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- linux-2.6.30-rc1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c 2009-04-08 09:24:11.000000000 -0700
> >> > +++ linux-2.6.30-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c 2009-04-08 09:24:23.000000000 -0700
> >> > @@ -2331,7 +2331,8 @@ set_desc_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc,
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > static void
> >> > -set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, const struct cpumask *mask)
> >> > +set_ioapic_irq_affinity_desc(struct irq_desc *desc,
> >> > + const struct cpumask *mask)
> >> > {
> >> > struct irq_cfg *cfg;
> >> > unsigned long flags;
> >> > @@ -2352,6 +2353,75 @@ set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(struct irq_
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > static void
> >> > +delayed_irq_move(struct work_struct *work)
> >> > +{
> >> > + unsigned int irq;
> >> > + struct irq_desc *desc;
> >> > +
> >> > + for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
> >> > + if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING) {
> >> > + unsigned long flags;
> >> > +
> >> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> >> > + if (!desc->chip->set_affinity ||
> >> > + !(desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING)) {
> >> > + desc->status &= ~IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
> >> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> >> > + continue;
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, desc->pending_mask);
> >> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> >> > + }
> >> > + }
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(delayed_irq_move_work, delayed_irq_move);
> >> > +
> >> > +static void
> >> > +set_ioapic_irq_affinity_level_desc(struct irq_desc *desc)
> >> > +{
> >> > +
> >> > + struct irq_cfg *cfg = desc->chip_data;
> >> > +
> >> > + mask_IO_APIC_irq_desc(desc);
> >> > +
> >> > + if (io_apic_level_ack_pending(cfg)) {
> >> > + /*
> >> > + * Interrupt in progress. Migrating irq now will change
> >> > + * the vector information in the IO-APIC RTE which will
> >> > + * confuse the EOI broadcast performed by cpu.
> >> > + * So, we delay the irq migration.
> >> > + */
> >> > + schedule_delayed_work(&delayed_irq_move_work, 1);
> >> > + goto unmask;
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Interrupt not in progress. we can change the vector
> >> > + * information in the IO-APIC RTE. */
> >> > + set_ioapic_irq_affinity_desc(desc, desc->pending_mask);
> >> > +
> >> > + desc->status &= ~IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
> >> > + cpumask_clear(desc->pending_mask);
> >> > +
> >> > +unmask:
> >> > + unmask_IO_APIC_irq_desc(desc);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static void
> >> > +set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(struct irq_desc *desc,
> >> > + const struct cpumask *mask)
> >> > +{
> >> > + if (desc->status & IRQ_LEVEL) {
> >> > + desc->status |= IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
> >> > + cpumask_copy(desc->pending_mask, mask);
> >> > + set_ioapic_irq_affinity_level_desc(desc);
> >> > + return;
> >> > + }
> >> > + set_ioapic_irq_affinity_desc(desc, mask);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static void
> >> > set_ioapic_affinity_irq(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *mask)
> >> > {
> >> > struct irq_desc *desc;
> >> > --
> >>
> >> it seems, ack_apic_level() already checked io_apic_level_ack_pending()
> >>
> >> cfg = desc->chip_data;
> >> if (!io_apic_level_ack_pending(cfg))
> >> move_masked_irq(irq);
> >> unmask_IO_APIC_irq_desc(desc);
> >
> > Yes, I have actually observed instances where the command
> > `echo $IRQ_MASK > /proc/irq/$VICTIM_IRQ/smp_affinity`
> > in the above test script failed to modify the affinity due to
> > a debug printk confirmed non-zero return from io_apic_level_ack_pending()
> > at this location. However, this is definitely not catching all the cases.
> > This was confirmed this with a printk in __target_IO_APIC_irq() that would
> > sometimes shows the Remote IRR bit set before the io_apic_modify() call.
> > e.g.
> > __target_IO_APIC_irq: XXX before io_apic_modify irq=25 vector=0xd9 reg=0x1e0d9
>
>
> that is strange, before that irq is masked,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> /* If we are moving the irq we need to mask it */
> if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING)) {
> do_unmask_irq = 1;
> mask_IO_APIC_irq_desc(desc);
> }
> #endif
When the device is very actively generating IRQs I suspect
that __target_IO_APIC_irq() is sometimes visited (via CPU
offline motivated path) before the IRQ is masked at this location.
I believe the vulnerability window is actually a bit larger
because it spans this mask_IO_APIC_irq_desc() call.
Gary
--
Gary Hade
System x Enablement
IBM Linux Technology Center
503-578-4503 IBM T/L: 775-4503
garyhade@us.ibm.com
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-13 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 21:07 Gary Hade
2009-04-08 22:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-08 23:08 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-11 6:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-13 19:37 ` Gary Hade [this message]
2009-04-13 20:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-28 0:05 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-28 10:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-29 0:44 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-29 1:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-29 17:17 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-29 17:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-30 18:15 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-30 21:17 ` Gary Hade
2009-05-24 0:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-10 21:39 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-11 7:35 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090413193717.GB8393@us.ibm.com \
--to=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®