From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: add #include <linux/delay.h> to fix build failure in test_work()
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:39:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090416083934.GB9813@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090416021928.239106997@goodmis.org>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
>
> As events start to become popular, and the new way to add tracing
> infrastructure into ftrace, it is important to catch any problems
> that might happen with a mistake in the TRACE_EVENT macro.
>
> This patch introduces a startup self test on the registered trace
> events. Note, it can only do a generic test, any type of testing
> that needs more involement is needed to be implemented by the
> tracepoint creators.
>
> The test goes down one by one enabling a trace point and running
> some random tasks (random in the sense that I just made them up).
> Those tasks are creating threads, grabbing mutexes and spinlocks
> and using workqueues.
>
> After testing each event individually, it does the same test after
> enabling each system of trace points. Like sched, irq, lockdep.
>
> Then finally it enables all tracepoints and performs the tasks
> again. The output to the console on bootup will look like this
> when everything works:
>
> Running tests on trace events:
> Testing event kfree_skb: OK
> Testing event kmalloc: OK
> Testing event kmem_cache_alloc: OK
> Testing event kmalloc_node: OK
> Testing event kmem_cache_alloc_node: OK
> Testing event kfree: OK
> Testing event kmem_cache_free: OK
> Testing event irq_handler_exit: OK
> Testing event irq_handler_entry: OK
> Testing event softirq_entry: OK
> Testing event softirq_exit: OK
> Testing event lock_acquire: OK
> Testing event lock_release: OK
> Testing event sched_kthread_stop: OK
> Testing event sched_kthread_stop_ret: OK
> Testing event sched_wait_task: OK
> Testing event sched_wakeup: OK
> Testing event sched_wakeup_new: OK
> Testing event sched_switch: OK
> Testing event sched_migrate_task: OK
> Testing event sched_process_free: OK
> Testing event sched_process_exit: OK
> Testing event sched_process_wait: OK
> Testing event sched_process_fork: OK
> Testing event sched_signal_send: OK
> Running tests on trace event systems:
> Testing event system skb: OK
> Testing event system kmem: OK
> Testing event system irq: OK
> Testing event system lockdep: OK
> Testing event system sched: OK
> Running tests on all trace events:
> Testing all events: OK
Thanks Steve, really nice!
FYI, it needed the small build fix below.
Ingo
------------------------>
>From 63c14122a54c26122ccdbe596123f8e2b75c3116 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:26:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: add #include <linux/delay.h> to fix build failure in test_work()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This build failure occured on a few rare configs:
kernel/trace/trace_events.c: In function ‘test_work’:
kernel/trace/trace_events.c:975: error: implicit declaration of function ‘udelay’
kernel/trace/trace_events.c:980: error: implicit declaration of function ‘msleep’
delay.h is included in way too many other headers, hiding cases
where new usage is added without header inclusion.
Impact: build fix
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 96934f0..791501d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include "trace_output.h"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-16 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 2:18 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] updates for tip Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 2:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] ftrace: use module notifier for function tracer Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 15:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-16 15:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 11:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-19 11:25 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-20 13:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-21 5:15 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-21 13:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-21 13:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 17:51 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-21 18:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-21 18:47 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-22 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 22:20 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-22 22:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-04-23 19:40 ` Anders Kaseorg
2009-04-23 19:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-23 22:31 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-24 3:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-04-23 20:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-04-16 2:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] tracing/events: add startup tests for events Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-16 14:08 ` [PATCH] tracing: add #include <linux/delay.h> to fix build failure in test_work() Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 0:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] tracing/events: add startup tests for events Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-16 15:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 16:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-16 2:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] tracing/events: add rcu locking around trace event prints Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 15:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 23:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 16:18 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-17 16:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 16:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-07 2:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-05-07 11:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 13:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 2:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] tracing/events/ring-buffer: expose format of ring buffer headers to users Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 2:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] tracing: add saved_cmdlines file to show cached task comms Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 15:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-16 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 16:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-16 9:51 ` [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] updates for tip Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 9:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 13:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 16:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 0:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 16:30 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090416083934.GB9813@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®