mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@la.checkpoint.com>,
	Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>, Eugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: [patch 14/18] clockevents: prevent endless loop in tick_handle_periodic()
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 13:30:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090506203130.784258238@blue.kroah.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090506203353.GA14624@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: clockevents-prevent-endless-loop-in-tick_handle_periodic.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2052 bytes --]

2.6.27-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>

commit 74a03b69d1b5ce00a568e142ca97e76b7f5239c6 upstream.

tick_handle_periodic() can lock up hard when a one shot clock event
device is used in combination with jiffies clocksource.

Avoid an endless loop issue by requiring that a highres valid
clocksource be installed before we call tick_periodic() in a loop when
using ONESHOT mode. The result is we will only increment jiffies once
per interrupt until a continuous hardware clocksource is available.

Without this, we can run into a endless loop, where each cycle through
the loop, jiffies is updated which increments time by tick_period or
more (due to clock steering), which can cause the event programming to
think the next event was before the newly incremented time and fail
causing tick_periodic() to be called again and the whole process loops
forever.

[ Impact: prevent hard lock up ]

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
 kernel/time/tick-common.c |   12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -93,7 +93,17 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_e
 	for (;;) {
 		if (!clockevents_program_event(dev, next, ktime_get()))
 			return;
-		tick_periodic(cpu);
+		/*
+		 * Have to be careful here. If we're in oneshot mode,
+		 * before we call tick_periodic() in a loop, we need
+		 * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource.
+		 * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite
+		 * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies,
+		 * when then will increment time, posibly causing
+		 * the loop to trigger again and again.
+		 */
+		if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres())
+			tick_periodic(cpu);
 		next = ktime_add(next, tick_period);
 	}
 }



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090506203010.615363711@blue.kroah.org>
2009-05-06 20:33 ` [patch 00/18] 2.6.27.23-stable review Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 01/18] drm/i915: add support for G41 chipset Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 02/18] virtio-rng: Remove false BUG for spurious callbacks Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 03/18] USB: Unusual Device support for Gold MP3 Player Energy Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 04/18] forcedeth: Fix resume from hibernation regression Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 05/18] b43: Poison RX buffers Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 06/18] b43: Refresh RX poison on buffer recycling Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 07/18] kbuild: fix Module.markers permission error under cygwin Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 08/18] pagemap: require aligned-length, non-null reads of /proc/pid/pagemap Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 09/18] PCI quirk: disable MSI on VIA VT3364 chipsets Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 10/18] x86/PCI: dont call e820_all_mapped with -1 in the mmconfig case Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 11/18] ACPI: Revert conflicting workaround for BIOS w/ mangled PRT entries Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 12/18] MIPS: CVE-2009-0029: Enable syscall wrappers Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 13/18] USB: serial: fix lifetime and locking problems Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 15/18] Ignore madvise(MADV_WILLNEED) for hugetlbfs-backed regions Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 16/18] mv643xx_eth: 64bit mib counter read fix Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 17/18] proc: avoid information leaks to non-privileged processes Greg KH
2009-05-06 20:30   ` [patch 18/18] rndis_wlan: fix initialization order for workqueue&workers Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090506203130.784258238@blue.kroah.org \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=cavokz@gmail.com \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuckw@quantumlinux.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=eteo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jake@lwn.net \
    --cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=rbranco@la.checkpoint.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®