From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 MCE: shut up lockdep warning
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 20:14:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090508121448.GA1807@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090508093757.GY23223@one.firstfloor.org>
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 05:37:57PM +0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > - it works around a lockdep warning
> >
> > - you did not realize the real bug while the warning was plain
>
> Well I'm not sure you understood it either :) Actually I'm pretty
> sure you did not. It would have been good if you had awaited proper
> review comments before commiting your patch.
>
> I don't think here's really a real bug because cpu hotunplug is single threaded
> anyways (cpu add remove lock) and we don't do multiple discoveries in parallel.
>
> The reason the lock is there is only during bringup with multiple CPUs
> doing this in parallel on initial bootup. But we can't race against cpu
> hotunplug there because there's not hotunplug before the system
> is up with all configured CPUs.
>
> So I think any way of shutting up lockdep is fine here and your
> patch is overkill and disables interrupts unnecessarily.
yes, this isn't a real bug, but just a false warning from lockdep. It's
my fault I didn't point this out first.
> > - plus the patch introduces a fragile (because complex)
> > work_on_cpu() call into the CPU hotplug path, which could have
> > caused followup regressions.
>
> That's a reasonable point, but doesn't seem strong enough to
> do full irq disabling. A better fix would be to find some other
> way to shut off this lockdep warning for this case. Is there
> such a way?
I tried to assign a lockdep class to the mce lock, which is the usual
way to avoid lockdep warning, but it appears not working here.
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-08 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 3:47 Shaohua Li
2009-05-08 6:45 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-08 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-08 9:37 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-08 12:14 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2009-05-08 8:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-05-08 8:28 ` [PATCH] x86 MCE: yet another " Hidetoshi Seto
2009-05-08 9:07 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: MCE: make cmci_discover_lock irq-safe tip-bot for Hidetoshi Seto
2009-05-08 8:34 ` [PATCH] x86 MCE: shut up lockdep warning Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-08 19:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-08 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090508121448.GA1807@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®