From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Openipmi-developer] modprobe ipmi_si hangs under 2.6.30-rc5
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:40:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090518184053.GA24134@minyard.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877i0eqpss.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:33:23PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > Well there have only been a handful of changes to ipmi since 2.6.29.
> > Could you try a mini-bisection?
> >
> > Apply revert-1.patch, test
> > Apply revert-2.patch, test
> > Apply revert-3.patch, test
> > Apply revert-4.patch, test
>
> After applying revert-1.patch, modprobe runs OK:
>
> [ 86.968156] IPMI System Interface driver.
> [ 86.976276] ipmi_si: Trying SMBIOS-specified smic state machine at i/o address 0xecf4, slave address 0x20, irq 0
> [ 87.117630] ipmi: Found new BMC (man_id: 0x0002a2, prod_id: 0x0000, dev_id: 0x00)
> [ 87.133078] IPMI smic interface initialized
>
> I guess there's no point in trying the rest.
I think I see the problem. Can you try the patch at the end of the
email? I can't test it because I don't have an IPMI 1.0 sytem.
Thanks for setting up the mini-bisection, Andrew.
>
> When loading with debug options, it still produces insane amount of
> debug messages continuously (first 671 lines of it attached).
Yes, full debugging generates a ton of output, it logs everything it does
in that case.
Thanks,
-corey
Set the current channel to the number of channels in an IPMI 1.0 system,
as this value is used to tell if the channel information has been
initialized.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index aa83a08..48f4269 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -2856,6 +2856,7 @@ int ipmi_register_smi(struct ipmi_smi_handlers *handlers,
/* Assume a single IPMB channel at zero. */
intf->channels[0].medium = IPMI_CHANNEL_MEDIUM_IPMB;
intf->channels[0].protocol = IPMI_CHANNEL_PROTOCOL_IPMB;
+ intf->curr_channel = 1;
}
if (rv == 0)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-18 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 21:28 Ferenc Wagner
2009-05-17 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-18 17:33 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-05-18 18:40 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
2009-05-19 6:26 ` [Openipmi-developer] " Ferenc Wagner
2009-05-19 21:38 ` Corey Minyard
2009-05-20 16:15 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-05-20 16:34 ` Corey Minyard
2009-05-21 9:47 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-05-21 12:37 ` Corey Minyard
2009-05-27 12:10 ` Bela Lubkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090518184053.GA24134@minyard.local \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=wferi@niif.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome