From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Pantelis Koukousoulas <pktoss@gmail.com>
Cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: How to tell whether a struct file is held by a process?
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:12:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090522151235.26432fbc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295ed070905220652q55c65e8bx992940b626eecda3@mail.gmail.com>
> Who is "me" in this case? Assuming that those writing the userspace programs
> are cooperative though, I agree. We can declare that whatever program does not
The software authors.
> play by the (userspace locking) rules is crap and either fix it (if open source)
> or refuse to install it / complain (if closed source).
Which for the general case I think is reasonable. If the bad program is
determined to be bad then it can equally just ptrace the process with the
file open and drive it that way.
> >
> >> So, if there is a clean / acceptable way to handle the reset issue in userspace
> >
> > Firstly can you explain *why* you think there is a problem ?
> >
>
> I admit this could be a bias from the way I imagined the whole thing
> to work before
> this discussion. I think I can see how a userspace locking scheme based on port
> numbers could avoid also the reset problem
That was a serious request to understand what you think the problem is
and what problem is worrying you. I'm deeply sceptical of the need for
any kernel locking on this one but I'd like to understand better why you
think there are some cases it would be needed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-22 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 16:57 Alan Stern
2009-05-21 9:52 ` Al Viro
2009-05-21 14:06 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-21 21:07 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-21 21:27 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-22 13:30 ` Pantelis Koukousoulas
2009-05-22 13:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-05-22 13:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-22 13:52 ` Pantelis Koukousoulas
2009-05-22 14:12 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2009-05-22 14:29 ` Pantelis Koukousoulas
2009-05-21 22:14 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-22 1:28 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-05-22 9:53 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-22 15:12 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-22 15:20 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-22 16:04 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-22 16:23 ` Pantelis Koukousoulas
2009-05-22 18:19 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-22 15:21 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-22 15:54 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-22 18:24 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-22 18:48 ` Pantelis Koukousoulas
2009-05-22 19:31 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-22 21:54 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-22 22:07 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-23 22:47 ` Kay Sievers
2009-05-22 8:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-05-21 22:22 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-22 12:26 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090522151235.26432fbc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pktoss@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®