Re: [PATCH] mmc_spi: use EILSEQ for possible transmission errors

[Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1434 bytes --]

On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:02:51 -0700
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > >		 Remember that the
> > > firmware in the card can leverage "that's erased" knowledge for
> > > things like wear leveling.  SSDs and other storage devices would
> > > likewise benefit from such knowledge.  I'm quite certain there's
> > > been discussion about adding support for that in the block layer.
> > 
> > It's already in AFAIK. I even had code for hooking it up to mmc_block.
> > But it didn't produce any measurable results so I never merged it.
> 
> I'd expect the results would take time to show.  As in, they would
> facilitate wear leveling logic, which may be difficult to measure
> except by testing various cards to destruction ... even for vendors
> that *do* have decent wear leveling.  :)
> 

Who are these mythical decent vendors you speak of? ;)

Seriously though, the modifications to mmc_block can still be found
here if anyone wants to play with it:

http://git.infradead.org/users/drzeus/discard-2.6.git

I haven't checked if it still applies to the current version of the
kernel though, so you're on your own. ;)

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]