From: cl@linux-foundation.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [this_cpu_xx 09/11] X86 optimized this_cpu operations
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:18:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090605191852.015043974@gentwo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090605191819.376530498@gentwo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: this_cpu_x86_ops --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2253 bytes --]
Basically the existing percpu ops can be used. However, we do not pass a
reference to a percpu variable in. Instead an address of a percpu variable
is provided.
Both preempt, the non preempt and the irqsafe operations generate the same code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h 2009-06-04 13:38:01.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h 2009-06-04 14:21:22.000000000 -0500
@@ -140,6 +140,28 @@ do { \
#define percpu_or(var, val) percpu_to_op("or", per_cpu__##var, val)
#define percpu_xor(var, val) percpu_to_op("xor", per_cpu__##var, val)
+#define __this_cpu_read(pcp) percpu_from_op("mov", pcp)
+#define __this_cpu_write(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("mov", (pcp), val)
+#define __this_cpu_add(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("add", (pcp), val)
+#define __this_cpu_sub(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("sub", (pcp), val)
+#define __this_cpu_and(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("and", (pcp), val)
+#define __this_cpu_or(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("or", (pcp), val)
+#define __this_cpu_xor(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("xor", (pcp), val)
+
+#define this_cpu_read(pcp) percpu_from_op("mov", (pcp))
+#define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("mov", (pcp), val)
+#define this_cpu_add(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("add", (pcp), val)
+#define this_cpu_sub(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("sub", (pcp), val)
+#define this_cpu_and(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("and", (pcp), val)
+#define this_cpu_or(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("or", (pcp), val)
+#define this_cpu_xor(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("xor", (pcp), val)
+
+#define irqsafe_cpu_add(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("add", (pcp), val)
+#define irqsafe_cpu_sub(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("sub", (pcp), val)
+#define irqsafe_cpu_and(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("and", (pcp), val)
+#define irqsafe_cpu_or(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("or", (pcp), val)
+#define irqsafe_cpu_xor(pcp, val) percpu_to_op("xor", (pcp), val)
+
/* This is not atomic against other CPUs -- CPU preemption needs to be off */
#define x86_test_and_clear_bit_percpu(bit, var) \
({ \
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 19:18 [this_cpu_xx 00/11] Introduce this_cpu_xx operations cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 01/11] Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_* operations cl
2009-06-10 5:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-11 15:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 2:09 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-12 14:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17 8:09 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-17 8:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-17 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-18 1:08 ` Tejun Heo
2009-06-18 3:01 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 02/11] Use this_cpu operations for SNMP statistics cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 03/11] Use this_cpu operations for NFS statistics cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 04/11] Use this_cpu ops for network statistics cl
2009-06-08 11:27 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-08 20:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-08 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 05/11] this_cpu_ptr: Straight transformations cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 06/11] Eliminate get/put_cpu cl
2009-06-05 19:34 ` Dan Williams
2009-06-09 14:02 ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 07/11] xfs_icsb_modify_counters does not need "cpu" variable cl
2009-06-05 19:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 19:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 08/11] Use this_cpu_ptr in crypto subsystem cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` cl [this message]
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 10/11] Use this_cpu ops for vm statistics cl
2009-06-05 19:18 ` [this_cpu_xx 11/11] RCU: Use this_cpu operations cl
2009-06-10 17:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090605191852.015043974@gentwo.org \
--to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®