* e1000e with kexec
@ 2009-07-12 8:17 Yinghai Lu
2009-07-12 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2009-07-12 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Jesse Brandeburg; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
e1000e in second kernel doesn't work again.
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: e1000e with kexec
2009-07-12 8:17 e1000e with kexec Yinghai Lu
@ 2009-07-12 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-12 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-12 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yinghai Lu; +Cc: Jesse Brandeburg, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Sunday 12 July 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> e1000e in second kernel doesn't work again.
Which version is the first one, which version is the second one?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: e1000e with kexec
2009-07-12 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-12 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-07-13 1:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2009-07-12 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Jesse Brandeburg, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Sunday 12 July 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> e1000e in second kernel doesn't work again.
>
> Which version is the first one, which version is the second one?
the same. current tree.
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: e1000e with kexec
2009-07-12 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu
@ 2009-07-13 1:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-13 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yinghai Lu; +Cc: Jesse Brandeburg, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Sunday 12 July 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 July 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> e1000e in second kernel doesn't work again.
> >
> > Which version is the first one, which version is the second one?
>
> the same. current tree.
I guess 2.6.30 was OK?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-13 1:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-12 8:17 e1000e with kexec Yinghai Lu
2009-07-12 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-12 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-07-13 1:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®