* linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
@ 2009-09-03 5:51 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-09-03 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, David Howells
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 513 bytes --]
Hi James,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/cred.c: In function 'cred_alloc_blank':
kernel/cred.c:234: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
Caused by commit ee18d64c1f632043a02e6f5ba5e045bb26a5465f ("KEYS: Add a
keyctl to install a process's session keyring on its parent [try #6]").
I have used the version from next-20090902 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
@ 2009-09-07 13:40 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-07 13:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-09-07 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, David Howells, Russell King
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 541 bytes --]
Hi David,
Today's linux-next build (arm lots of configs) failed like this:
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_notify_resume':
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:701: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracehook_notify_resume'
Caused by commit d0420c83f39f79afb82010c2d2cafd150eef651b ("KEYS: Extend
TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #6]"). Presumably
the include of linux/tracehook.h is missing.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
2009-09-07 13:40 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-09-07 13:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-08 0:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-09-07 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, David Howells, Russell King
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 745 bytes --]
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:40:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next build (arm lots of configs) failed like this:
>
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_notify_resume':
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:701: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracehook_notify_resume'
>
> Caused by commit d0420c83f39f79afb82010c2d2cafd150eef651b ("KEYS: Extend
> TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #6]"). Presumably
> the include of linux/tracehook.h is missing.
The avr32 defconfig build fails the same way as well. Thee may be
others, that is as far as we have gone so far.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
2009-09-07 13:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-09-08 0:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-08 3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-09-08 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, David Howells, Russell King
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1078 bytes --]
Hi James, David,
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:43:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:40:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (arm lots of configs) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_notify_resume':
> > arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:701: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracehook_notify_resume'
> >
> > Caused by commit d0420c83f39f79afb82010c2d2cafd150eef651b ("KEYS: Extend
> > TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #6]"). Presumably
> > the include of linux/tracehook.h is missing.
>
> The avr32 defconfig build fails the same way as well. Thee may be
> others, that is as far as we have gone so far.
This also broke the alpha and mips builds. I am going to use the version
of the security-testing tree from next-20090902 (the latest version I
have before the above commit was added) for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
2009-09-08 0:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-09-08 3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-09-08 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, David Howells, Russell King
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 307 bytes --]
Hi James, David,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:40:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> This also broke the alpha and mips builds. I am going to use the version
And cris :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
@ 2009-09-07 10:38 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-09-07 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, David Howells
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 699 bytes --]
Hi ,
Today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig) failed like this:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
include/linux/security.h:3012: error: 'security_key_session_to_parent' declared 'static' but never defined
Caused by commit ee18d64c1f632043a02e6f5ba5e045bb26a5465f ("KEYS: Add a
keyctl to install a process's session keyring on its parent [try #6]")
which I have reverted for today.
(I also reverted commit 945af7c3289c26c9070d6b1bf3ca759d36643e0b ("KEYS:
security_cred_alloc_blank() should return int under all circumstances")
which is a fix for the above commit.)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
@ 2009-08-07 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-10 14:07 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-08-07 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Eric Paris
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 651 bytes --]
Hi James,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/sysctl.c:1321: error: 'mmap_min_addr_handler' undeclared here (not in a function)
mm/mmap.c: In function 'do_mmap_pgoff':
mm/mmap.c:935: error: implicit declaration of function 'round_hint_to_min'
Caused by commit a2551df7ec568d87793d2eea4ca744e86318f205
("Security/SELinux: seperate lsm specific mmap_min_addr") -
CONFIG_SECURITY is not set in this build.
I have used the version of the security-testing tree from next-20090806
for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
2009-08-07 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-08-10 14:07 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-10 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-08-10 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: James Morris, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 14:59 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/sysctl.c:1321: error: 'mmap_min_addr_handler' undeclared here (not in a function)
> mm/mmap.c: In function 'do_mmap_pgoff':
> mm/mmap.c:935: error: implicit declaration of function 'round_hint_to_min'
>
> Caused by commit a2551df7ec568d87793d2eea4ca744e86318f205
> ("Security/SELinux: seperate lsm specific mmap_min_addr") -
> CONFIG_SECURITY is not set in this build.
>
> I have used the version of the security-testing tree from next-20090806
> for today.
Sorry, I thought I put the definitions outside of the ifdef in
security.h but clearly they aren't. Looks like James's tree has the fix
as of a couple of hours ago, so you should be fix on your next pull from
him.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
2009-08-10 14:07 ` Eric Paris
@ 2009-08-10 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-08-10 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris; +Cc: James Morris, linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 444 bytes --]
HI Eric,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:07:49 -0400 Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I thought I put the definitions outside of the ifdef in
> security.h but clearly they aren't. Looks like James's tree has the fix
> as of a couple of hours ago, so you should be fix on your next pull from
> him.
Great, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-08 3:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-03 5:51 linux-next: security-testing tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-07 13:40 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-07 13:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-08 0:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-08 3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-07 10:38 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-07 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-10 14:07 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-10 23:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®