mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf counters
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:58:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914172835.GB29531@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252571367-25876-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:29:25AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> This patch rebase the implementation of the breakpoints API on top of
> perf counters instances.
> 
> The core breakpoint API has changed a bit:
> 
> - register_kernel_hw_breakpoint() now takes a cpu as a parameter. For
>   now it doesn't support all cpu wide breakpoints but this may be
>   implemented soon.
> 
> - unregister_kernel_hw_breakpoint() and unregister_user_hw_breakpoint()
>   have been unified in a single unregister_hw_breakpoint()
> 
> Each breakpoints now match a perf counter which now handles the
> register scheduling, thread/cpu attachment, etc..
> 
[edited]
> 
> -/*
> - * Load the debug registers during startup of a CPU.
> - */
> -void load_debug_registers(void)

It does not appear that perf handles CPUs that come up new (if else,
blame my understanding of find_get_context():-)) and hence post breakpoint
integration, the new CPUs wouldn't contain any breakpoint values (meant
for all CPUs). As mentioned in my previous mail, this could be
non-trivial lapse in debugging scenarios and even for users like
ksym_tracer in ftrace. Your patch would want to retain the
functionality of load_debug_registers().

Thanks,
K.Prasad


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-14 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-10  8:29 [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf_counter: Add open/close pmu callbacks Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:22   ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:46     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf_counter: Export various perf helpers for external users Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 11:28   ` Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 18:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:25   ` K.Prasad
2009-09-10 18:53     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 21:18       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-14 21:18         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:17       ` K.Prasad
2009-09-14 21:33         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-11 22:09   ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14  3:41     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14  6:24       ` Jan Kiszka
2009-09-14 18:01         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-14 17:28   ` K.Prasad [this message]
2009-09-14 21:36     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw-breakpoints: Arbitrate access to pmu following registers constraints Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 14:41   ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 14:59       ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 15:02       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-10 18:53     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10  8:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] ksym_tracer: Remove KSYM_SELFTEST_ENTRY Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-10 10:09 ` [RFC GIT PULL] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf counters Paul Mackerras
2009-09-10 17:23   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-10 18:24   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090914172835.GB29531@in.ibm.com \
    --to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®