From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cl@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] SLQB: Mark the allocator as broken PowerPC and S390
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:38:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090917113837.GK18404@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB21C3D.2080202@in.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:53:41PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> Mel Gorman wrote:
> >I have access to a ppc machine but not necessarily one with a memoryless
> >nodes
> >that can reproduce this problem.
> >
> >Assuming Sachin is the reporter and we are in the same company, maybe I
> >have access to the machine. Sachin, can you mail me privately what this
> >machine is called and lets see can I get some time on that machine? By
> >any chance, was this bisected or did it just show up when SLQB became
> >the default?
> >
> Mel,
>
> Have sent you the access details for the machine. This bug showed
> up when SLQB was enabled as default in linux-next
Maybe it will be better to hold off merging until this is
debugged then? If it is merged as a non-default option, then
I can't see it being a huge issue to merge it a bit after the
window? It doesn't touch anything else...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 6:37 Pekka Enberg
2009-09-16 6:55 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-16 7:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-16 8:04 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-09-17 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-17 10:29 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-17 10:57 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-17 11:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-17 11:18 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-17 11:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-17 11:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-09-17 18:18 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-17 18:28 ` Nick Piggin
2009-09-17 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-17 18:51 ` Nick Piggin
2009-09-18 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-17 11:23 ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-17 11:38 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-09-17 11:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-17 11:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-09-17 11:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-17 12:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-09-17 12:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-17 12:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-09-17 12:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-09-17 12:42 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090917113837.GK18404@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®