From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/63] edac_mce: Add an interface driver to report mce errors via edac
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:46:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090925114646.48e186c2@pedra.chehab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090925135626.GA8145@aftab>
Em Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:56:26 +0200
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:11:30AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > > entry = rcu_dereference(mcelog.next);
> > > > for (;;) {
> > > > /*
> > > > + * If edac_mce is enabled, it will check the error type
> > > > + * and will process it, if it is a known error.
> > > > + * Otherwise, the error will be sent through mcelog
> > > > + * interface
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (edac_mce_parse(mce))
> > > > + return;
> > >
> > > for the third time (!): this may run in NMI context and as such does not
> > > obey to normal kernel locking rules and you cannot safely use almost any
> > > kernel resources involving locking. This way, your hook calls into a
> > > module, which is a very bad idea. Please remove that hook and put in the
> > > polling routine or somewhere more appropriate.
> >
> > I had answered you already, but let me give a more complete explanation.
> >
> > For sure all the code called at this point should be carefully analyzed. So,
> > let's see the complete implementation:
> >
> > 1) edac_mce is not a module (see patch 18). So, just calling a routine on
> > edac_mce should be safe, even at NMI;
>
> no, I mean the ->check_error member - it could call into a module if
> i7core_edac is compiled as such.
Yes, but calling a code inside a module already loaded in memory should work just fine
as calling a builtin code. As the module needs to be loaded first, in order to register
on edac_mce, there's no problem here.
> <snip the obvious non-registered module case>
>
> > 3) i7core_edac will only start handling mce events after being loaded on memory
> > and registered on edac_mce. If an error occurs before it, normal mce handling
> > will happen;
> >
> > 4) after registered, edac_mce will call this hook, at i7core_edac:
> >
> > static int i7core_mce_check_error(void *priv, struct mce *mce)
> > {
> > struct mem_ctl_info *mci = priv;
> > struct i7core_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > /*
> > * Just let mcelog handle it if the error is
> > * outside the memory controller
> > */
> > if (((mce->status & 0xffff) >> 7) != 1)
> > return 0;
> >
> > /* Bank 8 registers are the only ones that we know how to handle */
> > if (mce->bank != 8)
> > return 0;
> >
> > /* Only handle if it is the right mc controller */
> > if (cpu_data(mce->cpu).phys_proc_id != pvt->i7core_dev->socket) {
> > debugf0("mc%d: ignoring mce log for socket %d. "
> > "Another mc should get it.\n",
> > pvt->i7core_dev->socket,
> > cpu_data(mce->cpu).phys_proc_id);
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> One problem here is the debug call which is a printk() and you may
> deadlock while doing a printk in an NMI context. That's why you add MCEs
> to the lockless buffer in mce_log and decode them later - otherwise you
> could just as well printk them here.
That debug code can just be dropped. Anyway, this code disaperars if EDAC_DEBUG
is disabled.
> Generally, you need to keep the NMI handlers as short as possible and
> postpone the parsing of the MCEs for later.
True. The parser is outside the NMI called routine (except for UE, since you
may not have a chance of parsing the error outside it, as panic is called on
mce code).
--
Cheers,
Mauro
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-25 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-24 22:27 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-09-25 9:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-09-25 12:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-09-25 12:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 14:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-09-25 13:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-09-25 14:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-09-25 15:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 14:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090925114646.48e186c2@pedra.chehab.org \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®