From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to handle console devices
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:47:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090929234733.5b9fbc67@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0909291310200.18601-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
> I don't know what the best way is to accomplish this. Create dummy
> inode and file structs and pass them to the usual tty_open() routine?
> (But then what about hangup event handling?) What do you think?
What I long term envisioned was that
- Every tty (or at least every interesting tty) would have a tty_port
object for the hardware [done now for all consoles but vt]
- Every tty port object would have an "output" method
- The tty->termios would move to the tty_port
- The tty receive buffers would move to the tty_port (only needed for a
console that supports input)
At that point
- The tty lock/refcount isn't needed all the time for the receive data
paths which speeds it up a fair bit
- A console can be implemented without a tty_struct anywhere in sight
- Flow control and speed setting can be done on hardware generically on
resume paths
That fixes the lifetime and magic object invention issues that plague the
current console.
I still think that is the right way to fix it.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 3:08 [PATCH 0/3] usb console: 2.6.32 regression fixes Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 3:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb console: fix mutex lock regression Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 3:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb console,usb-serial: fix regression use of serial->console Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 3:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] usb console,usb-serial: pass initial console baud on to first tty open Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 3:32 ` Alan Stern
2009-09-17 3:40 ` Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 3:46 ` Alan Stern
2009-09-17 4:17 ` Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 9:14 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-17 12:16 ` Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 13:08 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-17 13:19 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-17 14:17 ` Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 16:02 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-22 20:54 ` Jason Wessel
2009-09-29 17:24 ` How to handle console devices Alan Stern
2009-09-29 22:47 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2009-09-17 3:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb console,usb-serial: fix regression use of serial->console Alan Stern
2009-09-17 3:32 ` Jason Wessel
2009-09-17 3:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb console: fix mutex lock regression Alan Stern
2009-09-17 3:32 ` Jason Wessel
2009-09-18 17:16 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090929234733.5b9fbc67@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®