From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: SGU UV Fix irq affinity for hub based interrupts
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:34:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091012193433.GB2691@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090930160259.GA7822@sgi.com>
* Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:
> This patch fixes handling of uv hub irq affinity. IRQs with ALL or
> NODE affinity can be routed to cpus other than their originally assigned
> cpu. Those with CPU affinity cannot be rerouted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
>
> ---
>
> More specific handling for NODE affinity will be added once the patch for
> limiting irq affinity is in place.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_irq.h | 15 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 49 ++++++++++++-
Could we please move all these UV specific functions out of the generic
IO-APIC code? You can do it as a followup patch to this one, but i'd
like to see the end result first before applying these - the interfacing
is rather messy right now.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-12 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 16:02 Dimitri Sivanich
2009-09-30 16:10 ` Robin Holt
2009-10-12 19:34 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-10-13 20:32 ` [PATCH] x86: Move SGI UV functionality out of generic IO-APIC code Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-14 8:18 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
[not found] ` <20091012193704.GA8708@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20091014071014.GK784@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20091014120225.GA9674@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20091014122653.GA15048@elte.hu>
2009-10-15 1:13 ` [PATCH v2] x86/apic: limit irq affinity Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-15 5:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-15 13:50 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-20 12:56 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-20 13:38 ` [PATCH v3] " Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-20 18:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-21 1:06 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-10-21 1:12 ` [PATCH v4] " Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-08 13:07 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/apic: Limit " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-08 14:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 16:02 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-10 4:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 16:31 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-10 17:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 18:57 ` [PATCH] Remove SMP ifdef from irq_desc Dimitri Sivanich
2009-11-16 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-10-14 8:17 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: SGI UV: Fix irq affinity for hub based interrupts tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091012193433.GB2691@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®