From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:38:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013063816.GB9470@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD41373.8010108@inria.fr>
* Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 08:19:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>> After that point the scheme is perfectly lossless.
> >>>>
> >>> Well if it can OOM it's not lossless, obviously. You just define
> >>> "event loss" to be equivalent to "Destruction of the universe." ;-)
> >>>
> >> It can't OOM once the ummunotify registration is done - when an event
> >> occurs it doesn't allocate any memory and it doesn't loose events.
> >>
> >
> > Well, it has built-in event loss via the UMMUNOTIFY_FLAG_HINT mechanism:
> > any double events on the same range will cause an imprecise event to be
> > recorded and cause the loss of information.
> >
>
> The target (MPI) application doesn't care about how many events are
> coming here. It just needs to know whether something has been
> invalidated in the range. If so, it destroy the whole RDMA window
> anyway. So it's actually _good_ that multiple events are merged into a
> single one: the application only has to process a single event per
> partially-invalidated range.
it's not unconditionally good as the fuzzy-merge-events rule:
events[n].flags = UMMUNOTIFY_EVENT_FLAG_HINT;
events[n].hint_start = max(reg->start, reg->hint_start);
events[n].hint_end = min(reg->end, reg->hint_end);
in essence merges flushes into a single interval - which inevitably
might include areas of memory that were not flushed at all.
For example these two flushes:
[...] [...]
Would be merged into:
[..................]
Btw., isnt the above max/min logic buggy, causing lost events? Shouldnt
it be:
events[n].hint_start = min(reg->start, reg->hint_start);
events[n].hint_end = max(reg->end, reg->hint_end);
?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 4:38 Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 5:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 6:03 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 16:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-09-11 6:15 ` Brice Goglin
2009-09-11 6:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-11 6:22 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-11 6:40 ` [ofa-general] " Jason Gunthorpe
2009-09-11 16:58 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-15 7:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-15 8:27 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-15 12:38 ` Jeff Squyres
2009-09-15 11:34 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-15 14:57 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2009-09-28 20:49 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-28 21:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-09-16 16:30 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-16 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-17 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 14:24 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2009-09-17 14:32 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-17 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 15:03 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-17 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 15:45 ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-18 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-29 17:13 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-30 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-12 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-12 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-12 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 4:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-13 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 16:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-10-13 5:43 ` Brice Goglin
2009-10-13 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-09-30 17:06 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-02 16:32 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-02 20:45 ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-07 22:34 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-12 17:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091013063816.GB9470@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=jsquyres@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®