CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES vs. CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE

mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES vs. CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
@ 2009-10-20  9:10 Jan Beulich
  2009-10-20 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2009-10-20  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mingo, tglx, hpa; +Cc: linux-kernel

What is the reason for having these, under various conditions disagreeing
(see i386_defconfig), but supposedly redundant auto-selected config settings?

Thanks, Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES vs. CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
  2009-10-20  9:10 CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES vs. CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT Jan Beulich
@ 2009-10-20 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-10-20 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich, Arjan van de Ven; +Cc: tglx, hpa, linux-kernel


* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:

> What is the reason for having these, under various conditions 
> disagreeing (see i386_defconfig), but supposedly redundant 
> auto-selected config settings?

Mostly historic crappiness. Patches that clean up the situation would be 
welcome :)

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-20 13:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-20  9:10 CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES vs. CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT Jan Beulich
2009-10-20 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome