mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Maciej J. Woloszyk" <mat@esi.com.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PM: Use per-device D3 delays
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:42:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001012242.28322.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100101201235.GA31960@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>

On Friday 01 January 2010, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 07:55:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday 01 January 2010, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > While the bug report mentions "So it's just quirky hardware.",
> > > the implementation of your patch makes it seem like this delay attribute is
> > > totally "norm"al behaviour - I'm missing some more aggressive wording.
> > 
> > That's because it works both ways (please look at the changelog).
> 
> Ah, ok.
> 
> > I know of a few devices that don't need the PCI-prescribed 10 ms wait when
> > going from D3 to D0 and their drivers may use the d3_delay field to actually
> > set a _shorter_ delay.
> 
> Then why is the value lower-bounded by pci_pm_d3_delay
> (which, puzzlingly, was initialized to PCI_PM_D3_WAIT and thus 10
> before, which the patch now removes!),

That's because dev->d3_delay is initialized to PCI_PM_D3_WAIT for all devices.

> in pci_dev_d3_sleep()? (and pci_pm_d3_delay is being quirked in
> drivers/pci/quirks.c only, to 120)

Exactly because pci_pm_d3_delay is only necessary for some quirky chipsets
that require longer delays for _all_ devices (note that this cannot be handled
at the driver level).  So, we use dev->d3_delay (that the driver gave us),
unless the chipset is known to be quirky and requires a longer delay for
all devices (the driver has no chance to know about that).

Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-01 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-01 17:07 Andreas Mohr
2010-01-01 18:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-01 20:12   ` Andreas Mohr
2010-01-01 21:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-01-01 21:56       ` Andreas Mohr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-31 11:15 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-04 23:48 ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201001012242.28322.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=andi@lisas.de \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mat@esi.com.pl \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®