mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: s2disk hang update
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:58:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002172058.04043.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b2b86521002170327m1f08ff73ncca9e5eff77b1966@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> On 2/16/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> >> On 2/16/10, Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > On 2/15/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> >> On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> >> >>> Perhaps I spoke too soon.  I see the same hang if I run too many
> >> >>> applications.  The first hibernation fails with "not enough swap" as
> >> >>> expected, but the second or third attempt hangs (with the same
> >> >>> backtrace
> >> >>> as before).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The patch definitely helps though.  Without the patch, I see a hang
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> first time I try to hibernate with too many applications running.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, I have an idea.
> >> >>
> >> >> Can you try to apply the appended patch in addition and see if that
> >> >> helps?
> >> >>
> >> >> Rafael
> >> >
> >> > It doesn't seem to help.
> >>
> >> To be clear: It doesn't stop the hang when I hibernate with too many
> >> applications.
> >>
> >> It does stop the same hang in a different case though.
> >>
> >> 1. boot with init=/bin/bash
> >> 2. run s2disk
> >> 3. cancel the s2disk
> >> 4. repeat steps 2&3
> >>
> >> With the patch, I can run 10s of iterations, with no hang.
> >> Without the patch, it soon hangs, (in disable_nonboot_cpus(), as always).
> >>
> >> That's what happens on 2.6.33-rc7.  On 2.6.30, there is no problem.
> >> On 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 I don't get a hang, but dmesg shows an allocation
> >> failure after a couple of iterations ("kthreadd: page allocation
> >> failure. order:1, mode:0xd0").  It looks like it might be the same
> >> stop_machine thread allocation failure that causes the hang.
> >
> > Have you tested it alone or on top of the previous one?  If you've tested it
> > alone, please apply the appended one in addition to it and retest.
> >
> > Rafael
> 
> I did test with both patches applied together -
> 
> 1. [Update] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
> 2. "reducing the number of pages that we're going to keep preallocated by 20%"

In that case you can try to reduce the number of preallocated pages even more,
ie. change "/ 5" to "/ 2" (for example) in the second patch.

Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-17 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-02 15:03 Alan Jenkins
2010-01-02 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-02 14:21   ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-02 20:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-03 11:14       ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-09 16:36         ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-15 23:08           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-16 11:09             ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-16 15:12               ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-16 21:16                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-17 11:27                   ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-17 19:58                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-02-18 12:53                       ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-18 20:04                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-19 11:48                           ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-21 20:47                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-22 15:35                               ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-22 19:17                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-23 14:24                                   ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-23 21:13                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-24  1:20                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-24 20:19                                         ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-24 20:36                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-24 16:23                                       ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-24 20:52                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-25 13:10                                           ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-25 20:04                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-26  9:26                                               ` Alan Jenkins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201002172058.04043.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®