From: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: s2disk hang update
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:35:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B82A440.6010701@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002212147.07987.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4346 bytes --]
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday 19 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>
>> On 2/18/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 18 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/17/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/16/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday 16 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/16/10, Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/15/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps I spoke too soon. I see the same hang if I run too many
>>>>>>>>>>> applications. The first hibernation fails with "not enough
>>>>>>>>>>> swap"
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> expected, but the second or third attempt hangs (with the same
>>>>>>>>>>> backtrace
>>>>>>>>>>> as before).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The patch definitely helps though. Without the patch, I see a
>>>>>>>>>>> hang
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> first time I try to hibernate with too many applications
>>>>>>>>>>> running.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well, I have an idea.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to apply the appended patch in addition and see if
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> helps?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rafael
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It doesn't seem to help.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To be clear: It doesn't stop the hang when I hibernate with too many
>>>>>>>> applications.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It does stop the same hang in a different case though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. boot with init=/bin/bash
>>>>>>>> 2. run s2disk
>>>>>>>> 3. cancel the s2disk
>>>>>>>> 4. repeat steps 2&3
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With the patch, I can run 10s of iterations, with no hang.
>>>>>>>> Without the patch, it soon hangs, (in disable_nonboot_cpus(), as
>>>>>>>> always).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's what happens on 2.6.33-rc7. On 2.6.30, there is no problem.
>>>>>>>> On 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 I don't get a hang, but dmesg shows an
>>>>>>>> allocation
>>>>>>>> failure after a couple of iterations ("kthreadd: page allocation
>>>>>>>> failure. order:1, mode:0xd0"). It looks like it might be the same
>>>>>>>> stop_machine thread allocation failure that causes the hang.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you tested it alone or on top of the previous one? If you've
>>>>>>> tested it
>>>>>>> alone, please apply the appended one in addition to it and retest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did test with both patches applied together -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. [Update] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and
>>>>>> resume
>>>>>> 2. "reducing the number of pages that we're going to keep preallocated
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> 20%"
>>>>>>
>>>>> In that case you can try to reduce the number of preallocated pages even
>>>>> more,
>>>>> ie. change "/ 5" to "/ 2" (for example) in the second patch.
>>>>>
>>>> It still hangs if I try to hibernate a couple of times with too many
>>>> applications.
>>>>
>>> Hmm. I guess I asked that before, but is this a 32-bit or 64-bit system and
>>> how much RAM is there in the box?
>>>
>>> Rafael
>>>
>> EeePC 701. 32 bit. 512Mb RAM. 350Mb swap file, on a "first-gen" SSD.
>>
>
> Hmm. I'd try to make free_unnecessary_pages() free all of the preallocated
> pages and see what happens.
>
It still hangs in hibernation_snapshot() / disable_nonboot_cpus().
After apparently freeing over 400Mb / 100,000 pages of preallocated ram.
There is a change which I missed before. When I applied your first
patch ("Force GFP_NOIO during suspend" etc.), it did change the hung
task backtraces a bit. I don't know if it tells us anything.
Without the patch, there were two backtraces. The first backtrace
suggested a problem allocating pages for a kernel thread (at
copy_process() / try_to_free_pages()). The second showed that this
problem was blocking s2disk (at hibernation_snapshot() /
disable_nonboot_cpus() / stop_machine_create()).
With the GFP_NOIO patch, I see only the s2disk backtrace.
Thanks
Alan
[-- Attachment #2: free-all-prealloc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 575 bytes --]
diff --git a/kernel/power/snapshot.c b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
index 36cb168..970930a 100644
--- a/kernel/power/snapshot.c
+++ b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
@@ -1179,6 +1179,12 @@ static void free_unnecessary_pages(void)
to_free_normal -= save_highmem - alloc_highmem;
}
+ to_free_normal = alloc_normal;
+ printk(KERN_ERR "Freeing all %d preallocated pages\n",
+ to_free_normal);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "(and %d highmem pages, out of %d)\n",
+ alloc_highmem, to_free_highmem);
+
memory_bm_position_reset(©_bm);
while (to_free_normal > 0 && to_free_highmem > 0) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-22 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-02 15:03 Alan Jenkins
2010-01-02 20:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-02 14:21 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-02 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-03 11:14 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-09 16:36 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-15 23:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-16 11:09 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-16 15:12 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-16 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-17 11:27 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-17 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-18 12:53 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-18 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-19 11:48 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-21 20:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-22 15:35 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2010-02-22 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-23 14:24 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-23 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-24 1:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-24 20:19 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-24 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-24 16:23 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-24 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-25 13:10 ` Alan Jenkins
2010-02-25 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-26 9:26 ` Alan Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B82A440.6010701@googlemail.com \
--to=sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome