From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf inject + say no to __KERNEL__ only stuff
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 15:06:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503130623.GB23372@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503081313.GA7111@liondog.tnic>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date: Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:37:49AM +0200
>
> > It broke half of the non-x86 architectures. For example on Sparc defconfig:
> >
> > In file included from /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/hweight.h:4,
> > from /home/mingo/tip/arch/sparc/include/asm/bitops_32.h:103,
> > from /home/mingo/tip/arch/sparc/include/asm/bitops.h:6,
> > from /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/bitops.h:17,
> > from /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/kernel.h:15,
> > from /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/sched.h:54,
> > from /home/mingo/tip/arch/sparc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:13:
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h: In function '__arch_hweight32':
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h:8: error: implicit declaration of function '__sw_hweight32'
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h: In function '__arch_hweight16':
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h:13: error: implicit declaration of function '__sw_hweight16'
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h: In function '__arch_hweight8':
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h:18: error: implicit declaration of function '__sw_hweight8'
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h: In function '__arch_hweight64':
> > /home/mingo/tip/include/asm-generic/bitops/arch_hweight.h:23: error: implicit declaration of function '__sw_hweight64'
> >
> > (the failure on other architectures looks similar)
>
> Looks like we're missing the __sw_hweightXX prototype definitions in
> that include maze. Ingo, which -tip branch is that and can you put it
> somewhere for me to test?
it's tip:core/hweight. You should be able to do 'git checkout
tip/core/hweight' if you have -tip as a remote repository.
It's not merged into tip:master at the moment, but you can do it yourself via:
git merge tip/core/hweight
to get the tree i tested.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-02 22:58 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-02 22:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Don't use code surrounded by __KERNEL__ Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-02 22:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf/live: don't synthesize build ids at the end of a live mode trace Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-02 22:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf: add perf-inject builtin Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-02 22:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf record: Don't exit in live mode when no tracepoints are enabled Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-03 5:51 ` Tom Zanussi
2010-05-03 13:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-02 22:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf inject: Refactor read_buildid function Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-05-03 6:24 ` [PATCH 0/5] perf inject + say no to __KERNEL__ only stuff Ingo Molnar
2010-05-03 6:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-03 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-03 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-03 8:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-03 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-05-03 13:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-04 17:27 ` [tip:core/hweight] arch, hweight: Fix compilation errors tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503130623.GB23372@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®