mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 11:05:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100523090544.GB25524@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF689DD.2090306@kernel.org>


* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hello, Peter, Ingo.
> 
> On 05/18/2010 01:13 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On 05/13/2010 12:48 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> These four patches are the scheduler modifications necessary for cmwq
> >> and contains the following four patches.
> > 
> > Ping.
> > 
> 
> I know we're inside -rc1 merge window but I'm really 
> hoping to push cmwq through linux-next during this devel 
> cycle as the whole thing basically has been blocked 
> unchanged on scheduler changes for a couple of months 
> now.  So, can we please get this thing moving?

IIRC these changes are for some sort of speedup for btrfs, 
right?

I would really like to see before/after numbers on some 
important FS workload. How much of a speedup does it give?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-23  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-13 10:48 Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31  8:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31  9:48     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31  8:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31  9:55     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:06           ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:15             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:19               ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 11:47                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: add hooks for workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-05-31  8:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31  9:58     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:07         ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-17 23:13 ` [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Tejun Heo
2010-05-21 13:25   ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23  9:05     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-05-23  9:08       ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23  9:13         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23  9:24           ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 10:20             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23 10:26               ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-27  8:26                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100523090544.GB25524@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®