* BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ondemand/1327
@ 2010-05-30 8:02 andrew hendry
2010-05-30 8:35 ` andrew hendry
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: andrew hendry @ 2010-05-30 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1569 bytes --]
I get 6 of these logged together about 1 minute after startup on an i7-860.
Config attached. Distro is Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit.
Is this one known or should I start a bisect?
[ 64.924201] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: ondemand/1327
[ 64.924625] caller is nr_iowait_cpu+0x1a/0x40
[ 64.924627] Pid: 1327, comm: ondemand Not tainted 2.6.34 #2
[ 64.924629] Call Trace:
[ 64.924634] [<ffffffff81288548>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xd8/0xf0
[ 64.924637] [<ffffffff81042c7a>] nr_iowait_cpu+0x1a/0x40
[ 64.924641] [<ffffffff81089f42>] update_ts_time_stats+0x72/0x90
[ 64.924645] [<ffffffff81012759>] ? read_tsc+0x9/0x20
[ 64.924647] [<ffffffff81084733>] ? ktime_get+0x63/0xe0
[ 64.924650] [<ffffffff8108a162>] get_cpu_idle_time_us+0x52/0x80
[ 64.924654] [<ffffffff8140a44c>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1dc/0x430
[ 64.924657] [<ffffffff81407af5>] __cpufreq_governor+0xc5/0x190
[ 64.924660] [<ffffffff81407552>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x52/0x90
[ 64.924662] [<ffffffff81407d07>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x147/0x190
[ 64.924665] [<ffffffff81408125>] store_scaling_governor+0xe5/0x210
[ 64.924667] [<ffffffff81408480>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x20
[ 64.924672] [<ffffffff8151dc00>] ? _raw_write_unlock_irq+0x40/0x50
[ 64.924675] [<ffffffff814075f7>] store+0x67/0xa0
[ 64.924679] [<ffffffff811a1375>] sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x170
[ 64.924682] [<ffffffff8113b088>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x180
[ 64.924685] [<ffffffff8113b231>] sys_write+0x51/0x90
[ 64.924689] [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 20486 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ondemand/1327
2010-05-30 8:02 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ondemand/1327 andrew hendry
@ 2010-05-30 8:35 ` andrew hendry
2010-06-06 5:46 ` Maciej Rutecki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: andrew hendry @ 2010-05-30 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Running hdparm -tT /dev/sda gets a similar one.
[ 2705.519946] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: hdparm/2479
[ 2705.519948] caller is vfs_quota_sync+0x18c/0x350
[ 2705.519950] Pid: 2479, comm: hdparm Not tainted 2.6.34 #2
[ 2705.519951] Call Trace:
[ 2705.519953] [<ffffffff81288548>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xd8/0xf0
[ 2705.519956] [<ffffffff8118d21c>] vfs_quota_sync+0x18c/0x350
[ 2705.519958] [<ffffffff811621c0>] ? sync_one_sb+0x0/0x30
[ 2705.519960] [<ffffffff811621c0>] ? sync_one_sb+0x0/0x30
[ 2705.519962] [<ffffffff81162161>] __sync_filesystem+0x41/0xa0
[ 2705.519964] [<ffffffff811621e0>] sync_one_sb+0x20/0x30
[ 2705.519966] [<ffffffff8113cd54>] iterate_supers+0x84/0xd0
[ 2705.519969] [<ffffffff8116221f>] sys_sync+0x2f/0x70
[ 2705.519971] [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:02 PM, andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> wrote:
> I get 6 of these logged together about 1 minute after startup on an i7-860.
> Config attached. Distro is Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit.
> Is this one known or should I start a bisect?
>
> [ 64.924201] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
> code: ondemand/1327
> [ 64.924625] caller is nr_iowait_cpu+0x1a/0x40
> [ 64.924627] Pid: 1327, comm: ondemand Not tainted 2.6.34 #2
> [ 64.924629] Call Trace:
> [ 64.924634] [<ffffffff81288548>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xd8/0xf0
> [ 64.924637] [<ffffffff81042c7a>] nr_iowait_cpu+0x1a/0x40
> [ 64.924641] [<ffffffff81089f42>] update_ts_time_stats+0x72/0x90
> [ 64.924645] [<ffffffff81012759>] ? read_tsc+0x9/0x20
> [ 64.924647] [<ffffffff81084733>] ? ktime_get+0x63/0xe0
> [ 64.924650] [<ffffffff8108a162>] get_cpu_idle_time_us+0x52/0x80
> [ 64.924654] [<ffffffff8140a44c>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1dc/0x430
> [ 64.924657] [<ffffffff81407af5>] __cpufreq_governor+0xc5/0x190
> [ 64.924660] [<ffffffff81407552>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x52/0x90
> [ 64.924662] [<ffffffff81407d07>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x147/0x190
> [ 64.924665] [<ffffffff81408125>] store_scaling_governor+0xe5/0x210
> [ 64.924667] [<ffffffff81408480>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x20
> [ 64.924672] [<ffffffff8151dc00>] ? _raw_write_unlock_irq+0x40/0x50
> [ 64.924675] [<ffffffff814075f7>] store+0x67/0xa0
> [ 64.924679] [<ffffffff811a1375>] sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x170
> [ 64.924682] [<ffffffff8113b088>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x180
> [ 64.924685] [<ffffffff8113b231>] sys_write+0x51/0x90
> [ 64.924689] [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ondemand/1327
2010-05-30 8:35 ` andrew hendry
@ 2010-06-06 5:46 ` Maciej Rutecki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Rutecki @ 2010-06-06 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrew hendry; +Cc: linux-kernel
On niedziela, 30 maja 2010 o 10:35:44 andrew hendry wrote:
> Running hdparm -tT /dev/sda gets a similar one.
>
> [ 2705.519946] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
> code: hdparm/2479
> [ 2705.519948] caller is vfs_quota_sync+0x18c/0x350
> [ 2705.519950] Pid: 2479, comm: hdparm Not tainted 2.6.34 #2
> [ 2705.519951] Call Trace:
> [ 2705.519953] [<ffffffff81288548>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xd8/0xf0
> [ 2705.519956] [<ffffffff8118d21c>] vfs_quota_sync+0x18c/0x350
> [ 2705.519958] [<ffffffff811621c0>] ? sync_one_sb+0x0/0x30
> [ 2705.519960] [<ffffffff811621c0>] ? sync_one_sb+0x0/0x30
> [ 2705.519962] [<ffffffff81162161>] __sync_filesystem+0x41/0xa0
> [ 2705.519964] [<ffffffff811621e0>] sync_one_sb+0x20/0x30
> [ 2705.519966] [<ffffffff8113cd54>] iterate_supers+0x84/0xd0
> [ 2705.519969] [<ffffffff8116221f>] sys_sync+0x2f/0x70
> [ 2705.519971] [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:02 PM, andrew hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > I get 6 of these logged together about 1 minute after startup on an
> > i7-860. Config attached. Distro is Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit.
> > Is this one known or should I start a bisect?
> >
> > [ 64.924201] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
> > code: ondemand/1327
> > [ 64.924625] caller is nr_iowait_cpu+0x1a/0x40
> > [ 64.924627] Pid: 1327, comm: ondemand Not tainted 2.6.34 #2
> > [ 64.924629] Call Trace:
> > [ 64.924634] [<ffffffff81288548>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xd8/0xf0
> > [ 64.924637] [<ffffffff81042c7a>] nr_iowait_cpu+0x1a/0x40
> > [ 64.924641] [<ffffffff81089f42>] update_ts_time_stats+0x72/0x90
> > [ 64.924645] [<ffffffff81012759>] ? read_tsc+0x9/0x20
> > [ 64.924647] [<ffffffff81084733>] ? ktime_get+0x63/0xe0
> > [ 64.924650] [<ffffffff8108a162>] get_cpu_idle_time_us+0x52/0x80
> > [ 64.924654] [<ffffffff8140a44c>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1dc/0x430
> > [ 64.924657] [<ffffffff81407af5>] __cpufreq_governor+0xc5/0x190
> > [ 64.924660] [<ffffffff81407552>] ? lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x52/0x90
> > [ 64.924662] [<ffffffff81407d07>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x147/0x190
> > [ 64.924665] [<ffffffff81408125>] store_scaling_governor+0xe5/0x210
> > [ 64.924667] [<ffffffff81408480>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x20
> > [ 64.924672] [<ffffffff8151dc00>] ? _raw_write_unlock_irq+0x40/0x50
> > [ 64.924675] [<ffffffff814075f7>] store+0x67/0xa0
> > [ 64.924679] [<ffffffff811a1375>] sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x170
> > [ 64.924682] [<ffffffff8113b088>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x180
> > [ 64.924685] [<ffffffff8113b231>] sys_write+0x51/0x90
> > [ 64.924689] [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Seems be similar:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/21
Regards
--
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.maciek.unixy.pl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-06 5:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-30 8:02 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ondemand/1327 andrew hendry
2010-05-30 8:35 ` andrew hendry
2010-06-06 5:46 ` Maciej Rutecki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®