mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Linux IO scalability and pushing over million IOPS over software iSCSI?
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:44:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100622134410.GT17817@reaktio.net> (raw)

Hello,

Recently Intel and Microsoft demonstrated pushing over 1.25 million IOPS using software iSCSI and a single 10 Gbit NIC:
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/22/1-million-iops-how-about-125-million

Earlier they achieved one (1.0) million IOPS:
http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/01/14/microsoft-intel-push-million-iscsi-iops/
http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2010/01/19/1000000-iops-with-iscsi--thats-not-a-typo

The benchmark setup explained:
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/20/1-million-iop-article-explained
http://dlbmodigital.microsoft.com/ppt/TN-100114-JSchwartz_SMorgan_JPlawner-1032432956-FINAL.pdf


So the question is.. does someone have enough new hardware to try this with Linux?
Can Linux scale to over 1 million IO operations per second?


Intel and Microsoft used the following for the benchmark:

	- Single Windows 2008 R2 system with Intel Xeon 5600 series CPU, 
	  single-port Intel 82599 10 Gbit NIC and MS software-iSCSI initiator 
	  connecting to 50x iSCSI LUNs.
	- IOmeter to benchmark all the 50x iSCSI LUNs concurrently.

	- 10 servers as iSCSI targets, each having 5x ramdisk LUNs, total of 50x ramdisk LUNs.
	- iSCSI target server also used 10 Gbit NICs, and StarWind iSCSI target software.
	- Cisco 10 Gbit switch (Nexus) connecting the servers.

	- For the 1.25 million IOPS result they used 512 bytes/IO benchmark, outstanding IOs=20.
	- No jumbo frames, just the standard MTU=1500.

They used many LUNs so they can scale the iSCSI connections to multiple CPU cores 
using RSS (Receive Side Scaling) and MSI-X interrupts. 

So.. Who wants to try this? :) I don't unfortunately have 11x extra computers with 10 Gbit NICs atm to try it myself..

This test covers networking, block layer, and software iSCSI initiator..
so it would be a nice to see if we find any bottlenecks from current Linux kernel.

Comments please!

-- Pasi


             reply	other threads:[~2010-06-22 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-22 13:44 Pasi Kärkkäinen [this message]
2010-06-22 16:24 ` Jiahua
2010-06-22 17:40   ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-25  9:36 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100622134410.GT17817@reaktio.net \
    --to=pasik@iki.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®