From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Linux IO scalability and pushing over million IOPS over software iSCSI?
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:36:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100625093600.GE17817@reaktio.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100622134410.GT17817@reaktio.net>
Hello,
How about numbers using other transports? FC? Has someone done benchmarks recently?
-- Pasi
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:44:10PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently Intel and Microsoft demonstrated pushing over 1.25 million IOPS using software iSCSI and a single 10 Gbit NIC:
> http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/22/1-million-iops-how-about-125-million
>
> Earlier they achieved one (1.0) million IOPS:
> http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/01/14/microsoft-intel-push-million-iscsi-iops/
> http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2010/01/19/1000000-iops-with-iscsi--thats-not-a-typo
>
> The benchmark setup explained:
> http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/20/1-million-iop-article-explained
> http://dlbmodigital.microsoft.com/ppt/TN-100114-JSchwartz_SMorgan_JPlawner-1032432956-FINAL.pdf
>
>
> So the question is.. does someone have enough new hardware to try this with Linux?
> Can Linux scale to over 1 million IO operations per second?
>
>
> Intel and Microsoft used the following for the benchmark:
>
> - Single Windows 2008 R2 system with Intel Xeon 5600 series CPU,
> single-port Intel 82599 10 Gbit NIC and MS software-iSCSI initiator
> connecting to 50x iSCSI LUNs.
> - IOmeter to benchmark all the 50x iSCSI LUNs concurrently.
>
> - 10 servers as iSCSI targets, each having 5x ramdisk LUNs, total of 50x ramdisk LUNs.
> - iSCSI target server also used 10 Gbit NICs, and StarWind iSCSI target software.
> - Cisco 10 Gbit switch (Nexus) connecting the servers.
>
> - For the 1.25 million IOPS result they used 512 bytes/IO benchmark, outstanding IOs=20.
> - No jumbo frames, just the standard MTU=1500.
>
> They used many LUNs so they can scale the iSCSI connections to multiple CPU cores
> using RSS (Receive Side Scaling) and MSI-X interrupts.
>
> So.. Who wants to try this? :) I don't unfortunately have 11x extra computers with 10 Gbit NICs atm to try it myself..
>
> This test covers networking, block layer, and software iSCSI initiator..
> so it would be a nice to see if we find any bottlenecks from current Linux kernel.
>
> Comments please!
>
> -- Pasi
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-25 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-22 13:44 Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-22 16:24 ` Jiahua
2010-06-22 17:40 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-06-25 9:36 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100625093600.GE17817@reaktio.net \
--to=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®