mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Tomasz Buchert <tomasz.buchert@inria.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Wall time clocks + change in access rules
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:51:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100730135159.596eafe6@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100730132343.4c15bfdc@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com>

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:23:43 +0200
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote:

> Anyway, I think we need better rationale, before we can consider your wall 
> clock patches inclusion into the kernel.

To clarify. I'm not against your patches. I just would like to know 
why patches are needed (or maybe even how they are used) to see if there
is no other/better way to solve your problem. We do not want add new
code to kernel (and what more important - maintain it), if problem can
be solved differently.

Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-30 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-30  9:57 Tomasz Buchert
2010-07-30  9:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] posix-timers: Refactoring of CPUCLOCK* macros Tomasz Buchert
2010-07-30  9:57   ` [PATCH 2/4] posix-cpu-timers: Introduction of wall clocks Tomasz Buchert
2010-07-30  9:57     ` [PATCH 3/4] posix-cpu-timers: Wider access to the thread clocks Tomasz Buchert
2010-07-30  9:57       ` [PATCH 4/4] posix-cpu-timers: posix-cpu-timers.c renamed to posix-task-timers.c Tomasz Buchert
2010-07-30 11:30     ` [PATCH 2/4] posix-cpu-timers: Introduction of wall clocks Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-07-30 11:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] Wall time clocks + change in access rules Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-07-30 11:51   ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2010-07-30 14:58   ` Rationale for wall clocks Tomasz Buchert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-19 21:02 [PATCH 1/4] posix-timers: Refactoring of CPUCLOCK* macros Daniel Walker
2010-07-21 18:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] Wall time clocks + change in access rules Tomasz Buchert
2010-07-19 11:34 Tomasz Buchert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100730135159.596eafe6@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tomasz.buchert@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®