* [080/165] ethtool: Fix potential user buffer overflow for ETHTOOL_{G, S}RXFH
@ 2010-07-30 17:15 Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-07-30 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable
Cc: stable-review, torvalds, akpm, alan, Ben Hutchings, David S. Miller
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
commit bf988435bd5b53529f4408a8efb1f433f6ddfda9 upstream.
struct ethtool_rxnfc was originally defined in 2.6.27 for the
ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH command with only the cmd, flow_type and data
fields. It was then extended in 2.6.30 to support various additional
commands. These commands should have been defined to use a new
structure, but it is too late to change that now.
Since user-space may still be using the old structure definition
for the ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH commands, and since they do not need the
additional fields, only copy the originally defined fields to and
from user-space.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
include/linux/ethtool.h | 2 ++
net/core/ethtool.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
+++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
@@ -357,6 +357,8 @@ struct ethtool_rxnfc {
__u32 flow_type;
/* The rx flow hash value or the rule DB size */
__u64 data;
+ /* The following fields are not valid and must not be used for
+ * the ETHTOOL_{G,X}RXFH commands. */
struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec fs;
__u32 rule_cnt;
__u32 rule_locs[0];
--- a/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -216,22 +216,34 @@ static int ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct ne
return 0;
}
-static int ethtool_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
+static int ethtool_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev,
+ u32 cmd, void __user *useraddr)
{
- struct ethtool_rxnfc cmd;
+ struct ethtool_rxnfc info;
+ size_t info_size = sizeof(info);
if (!dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxnfc)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (copy_from_user(&cmd, useraddr, sizeof(cmd)))
+ /* struct ethtool_rxnfc was originally defined for
+ * ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH with only the cmd, flow_type and data
+ * members. User-space might still be using that
+ * definition. */
+ if (cmd == ETHTOOL_SRXFH)
+ info_size = (offsetof(struct ethtool_rxnfc, data) +
+ sizeof(info.data));
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&info, useraddr, info_size))
return -EFAULT;
- return dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxnfc(dev, &cmd);
+ return dev->ethtool_ops->set_rxnfc(dev, &info);
}
-static int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
+static int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev,
+ u32 cmd, void __user *useraddr)
{
struct ethtool_rxnfc info;
+ size_t info_size = sizeof(info);
const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
int ret;
void *rule_buf = NULL;
@@ -239,7 +251,15 @@ static int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_
if (!ops->get_rxnfc)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (copy_from_user(&info, useraddr, sizeof(info)))
+ /* struct ethtool_rxnfc was originally defined for
+ * ETHTOOL_{G,S}RXFH with only the cmd, flow_type and data
+ * members. User-space might still be using that
+ * definition. */
+ if (cmd == ETHTOOL_GRXFH)
+ info_size = (offsetof(struct ethtool_rxnfc, data) +
+ sizeof(info.data));
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&info, useraddr, info_size))
return -EFAULT;
if (info.cmd == ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL) {
@@ -257,7 +277,7 @@ static int ethtool_get_rxnfc(struct net_
goto err_out;
ret = -EFAULT;
- if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &info, sizeof(info)))
+ if (copy_to_user(useraddr, &info, info_size))
goto err_out;
if (rule_buf) {
@@ -1112,12 +1132,12 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct net *net, struct
case ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLCNT:
case ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRULE:
case ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL:
- rc = ethtool_get_rxnfc(dev, useraddr);
+ rc = ethtool_get_rxnfc(dev, ethcmd, useraddr);
break;
case ETHTOOL_SRXFH:
case ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLDEL:
case ETHTOOL_SRXCLSRLINS:
- rc = ethtool_set_rxnfc(dev, useraddr);
+ rc = ethtool_set_rxnfc(dev, ethcmd, useraddr);
break;
case ETHTOOL_GGRO:
rc = ethtool_get_gro(dev, useraddr);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-07-30 19:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-30 17:15 [080/165] ethtool: Fix potential user buffer overflow for ETHTOOL_{G, S}RXFH Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®