From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
To: dann frazier <dannf@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] hpwdt: make NMI code a config option (+ other cleanup)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 23:41:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100805214102.GA4288@infomag.iguana.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280274663-9160-1-git-send-email-dannf@hp.com>
Hi Dan,
> hwpdt includes an NMI-decoding feature, but the watchdog interface is quite
> usable without it. This patchset makes it possible to build hpwdt without the
> NMI functionality, as well as some general cleanup.
Looking at the overall overview we have:
watchdog: hpwdt (1/3): Introduce SECS_TO_TICKS() macro
watchdog: hpwdt (2/3): allow full range of timer values supported by hardware
watchdog: hpwdt (3/3): implement WDIOC_GETTIMELEFT
[PATCH 01/15] hpwdt_pretimeout reorganization
[PATCH 02/15] remove unnecessary includes
[PATCH 03/15] include spinlock.h
[PATCH 04/15] add include for linux/bitops.h
[PATCH 05/15] Group together includes specific to NMI sourcing
[PATCH 06/15] Group options that affect watchdog behavior together
[PATCH 07/15] Group defines only used by NMI sourcing together
[PATCH 08/15] Group declarations specific to NMI sourcing together
[PATCH 09/15] Despecificate driver from iLO2
[PATCH 10/15] Fix a typo
[PATCH 11/15] Make x86 assembly ifdef guard more strict
[PATCH 12/15] Construct status message w/ kasprintf and emit it with dev_info
[PATCH 13/15] Use "decoding" instead of "sourcing"
[PATCH 14/15] Make NMI decoding a compile-time option
[PATCH 15/15] Bump version to 1.2.0
When I look closer I see that:
* Some of the clean-up stuff changes things that were introduced in the first 3 (timer) patches.
Since these patches are not in mainline yet, it would be better to directly do it there.
(Which means that you don't need patch 7 anymore).
* The clean-up of includes (2, 3, 4 and maybe 5) can be a single patch.
* Patch 10 is correct but since you change the Kconfig help text in patch 14 anyway,
I would incorporate that in patch 14. Same for patch 15 -> this should be combined with patch 14 also.
* Personally I prefer to do the general clean-up first and then do the different changes for the NMI part.
* I don't like the ifdef's in the init and exit procedures. A procedure/function that is defined for both cases is the way that we should go here. (see patch 14).
So overall: patches look good, but let's re-order the patches a bit (so that we first clean-up the driver and then add the NMI related changes (If we ever need to revert some things then we at least have a clean-driver before we start bisecting the NMI changes)).
And secondly: let's try to have the ifdef's out of the init and exit procedures.
If you can look at how we can get rid of the ifdef's in init and exit, then I will reorder the patches and change the 3 timer patches and put that allready in a git tree.
Kind regards,
Wim.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-27 23:50 dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 01/15] hpwdt_pretimeout reorganization dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 02/15] remove unnecessary includes dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] include spinlock.h dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 04/15] add include for linux/bitops.h dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 05/15] Group together includes specific to NMI sourcing dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 06/15] Group options that affect watchdog behavior together dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 07/15] Group defines only used by NMI sourcing together dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 08/15] Group declarations specific to " dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 09/15] Despecificate driver from iLO2 dann frazier
2010-08-04 20:13 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2010-08-04 20:18 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2010-08-05 5:10 ` dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 10/15] Fix a typo dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:50 ` [PATCH 11/15] Make x86 assembly ifdef guard more strict dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:51 ` [PATCH 12/15] Construct status message w/ kasprintf and emit it with dev_info dann frazier
2010-07-28 18:38 ` dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:51 ` [PATCH 13/15] Use "decoding" instead of "sourcing" dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:51 ` [PATCH 14/15] Make NMI decoding a compile-time option dann frazier
2010-07-27 23:51 ` [PATCH 15/15] Bump version to 1.2.0 dann frazier
2010-07-28 13:10 ` [PATCH 00/15] hpwdt: make NMI code a config option (+ other cleanup) Mingarelli, Thomas
2010-08-05 21:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck [this message]
2010-08-06 21:26 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2010-08-06 21:29 ` dann frazier
2010-08-11 12:49 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2010-08-13 7:29 ` dann frazier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100805214102.GA4288@infomag.iguana.be \
--to=wim@iguana.be \
--cc=dannf@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.mingarelli@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®