mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:44:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008191644.29299.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m21va1ozqx.fsf@igel.home>

On Saturday 14 Aug 2010 18:44:38 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> The pid field of struct fanotify_event_metadata has 64 bits which looks
> excessive.  Wouldn't it make sense to make it 32 bits and swap it with
> the mask field?  That would avoid the unaligned mask field, and remove
> the need for the packed attribute.

No one seems to have picked up on this what I thought was an obvious good
idea.

So yes, 32-bit PID makes sense I think. If that was changed, would removing
the packed attribute get us anything more? If not it may stay for extra safety
if/when new fields are added.

Also, would it make sense to move mask in front of fd so 32-bit pid can stay
at the end? I think mask logically should be higher because is the more meta
data, while pid is auxiliary.

Tvrtko

Sophos Plc, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, United Kingdom.
Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 348 3873 20.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-19 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-14 17:44 Andreas Schwab
2010-08-19 15:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2010-08-19 16:07   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-08-19 16:35     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-08-19 17:53   ` Eric Paris
2010-08-20  9:02     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-08-20  9:16       ` Andreas Schwab
2010-08-20  9:23         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-08-20 13:13         ` Eric Paris
2010-08-20 13:27           ` Andreas Schwab
2010-08-20 15:19             ` Eric Paris
2010-08-20 17:47               ` Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201008191644.29299.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®