From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
oss-security@lists.openwall.com,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec argument expansion can inappropriately trigger OOM-killer
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:19:58 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100830091909.5248.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100827220258.GF4703@outflux.net>
> Brad Spengler published a local memory-allocation DoS that
> evades the OOM-killer (though not the virtual memory RLIMIT):
> http://www.grsecurity.net/~spender/64bit_dos.c
>
> The recent changes to create a stack guard page helps slightly to
> discourage this attack, but it is not sufficient. Compiling it statically
> moves the libraries out of the way, allowing the stack VMA to fill the
> entire TASK_SIZE.
>
> There are two issues:
> 1) the OOM killer doesn't notice this argv memory explosion
> 2) the argv expansion does not check if rlim[RLIMIT_STACK].rlim_cur is -1.
>
> I figure a quick solution for #2 would be the following patch. However,
> running multiple copies of this program could result in similar OOM
> behavior, so issue #1 still needs a solution.
>
>Reported-by: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
>Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
And, I have a patch for #1. Can you please see this? Alternative idea
is to change rss accounting itself.
>From d4e114e5d31b14ebfc399d4b1fb142c7dfce0ca4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:40:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] oom: don't ignore temporary rss while execve
execve() makes new mm struct and setup stack and argv vector,
Unfortunately this new mm is not pointed any tasks, then oom-kill
can't detect this memory usage. therefore oom-kill may kill incorrect
task.
This patch added in-exec rss treatness to oom.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/compat.c | 8 ++++++--
fs/exec.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/binfmts.h | 1 +
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
mm/oom_kill.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/compat.c b/fs/compat.c
index 718c706..643140c 100644
--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -1527,6 +1527,7 @@ int compat_do_execve(char * filename,
retval = bprm_mm_init(bprm);
if (retval)
goto out_file;
+ set_exec_mm(bprm->mm);
bprm->argc = compat_count(argv, MAX_ARG_STRINGS);
if ((retval = bprm->argc) < 0)
@@ -1560,6 +1561,7 @@ int compat_do_execve(char * filename,
/* execve succeeded */
current->fs->in_exec = 0;
current->in_execve = 0;
+ set_exec_mm(NULL);
acct_update_integrals(current);
free_bprm(bprm);
if (displaced)
@@ -1567,8 +1569,10 @@ int compat_do_execve(char * filename,
return retval;
out:
- if (bprm->mm)
- mmput(bprm->mm);
+ if (current->in_exec_mm) {
+ struct mm_struct *in_exec_mm = set_exec_mm(NULL);
+ mmput (in_exec_mm);
+ }
out_file:
if (bprm->file) {
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 2d94552..85192e1 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1314,6 +1314,17 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm,struct pt_regs *regs)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(search_binary_handler);
+struct mm_struct* set_exec_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *old = current->in_exec_mm;
+
+ task_lock(current);
+ current->in_exec_mm = mm;
+ task_unlock(current);
+
+ return old;
+}
+
/*
* sys_execve() executes a new program.
*/
@@ -1361,6 +1372,7 @@ int do_execve(const char * filename,
retval = bprm_mm_init(bprm);
if (retval)
goto out_file;
+ set_exec_mm(bprm->mm);
bprm->argc = count(argv, MAX_ARG_STRINGS);
if ((retval = bprm->argc) < 0)
@@ -1395,6 +1407,7 @@ int do_execve(const char * filename,
/* execve succeeded */
current->fs->in_exec = 0;
current->in_execve = 0;
+ set_exec_mm(NULL);
acct_update_integrals(current);
free_bprm(bprm);
if (displaced)
@@ -1402,8 +1415,10 @@ int do_execve(const char * filename,
return retval;
out:
- if (bprm->mm)
- mmput (bprm->mm);
+ if (current->in_exec_mm) {
+ struct mm_struct *in_exec_mm = set_exec_mm(NULL);
+ mmput (in_exec_mm);
+ }
out_file:
if (bprm->file) {
diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h
index a065612..8cf61eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/binfmts.h
+++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ extern void install_exec_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
extern void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void set_binfmt(struct linux_binfmt *new);
extern void free_bprm(struct linux_binprm *);
+extern struct mm_struct* set_exec_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _LINUX_BINFMTS_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 1e2a6db..d413757 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1217,6 +1217,7 @@ struct task_struct {
struct plist_node pushable_tasks;
struct mm_struct *mm, *active_mm;
+ struct mm_struct *in_exec_mm;
#if defined(SPLIT_RSS_COUNTING)
struct task_rss_stat rss_stat;
#endif
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 57c05f7..7fc6916 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -120,6 +120,30 @@ struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
return NULL;
}
+static unsigned long calculate_rss_swap(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = p;
+ int mm_accounted = 0;
+ unsigned long points = 0;
+
+ do {
+ task_lock(t);
+ if (!mm_accounted && t->mm) {
+ points += get_mm_rss(t->mm);
+ points += get_mm_counter(t->mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
+ mm_accounted = 1;
+ }
+ if (t->in_exec_mm) {
+ points += get_mm_rss(t->in_exec_mm);
+ points += get_mm_counter(t->in_exec_mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
+ }
+ task_unlock(t);
+ } while_each_thread(p, t);
+
+ return points;
+}
+
+
/* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */
static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
const nodemask_t *nodemask)
@@ -157,16 +181,11 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
if (oom_unkillable_task(p, mem, nodemask))
return 0;
- p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
- if (!p)
- return 0;
-
/*
* Shortcut check for OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN so the entire heuristic doesn't
* need to be executed for something that cannot be killed.
*/
if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
- task_unlock(p);
return 0;
}
@@ -175,7 +194,6 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
* priority for oom killing.
*/
if (p->flags & PF_OOM_ORIGIN) {
- task_unlock(p);
return 1000;
}
@@ -190,9 +208,9 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
* The baseline for the badness score is the proportion of RAM that each
* task's rss and swap space use.
*/
- points = (get_mm_rss(p->mm) + get_mm_counter(p->mm, MM_SWAPENTS)) * 1000 /
- totalpages;
- task_unlock(p);
+ points = calculate_rss_swap(p) * 1000 / totalpages;
+ if (!points)
+ return 0;
/*
* Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory()
--
1.6.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-30 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-27 22:02 Kees Cook
2010-08-30 0:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-08-30 0:56 ` Roland McGrath
2010-08-30 3:23 ` Solar Designer
2010-08-30 10:06 ` Roland McGrath
2010-08-30 19:48 ` Solar Designer
2010-08-31 0:40 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] execve argument-copying fixes Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] setup_arg_pages: diagnose excessive argument size Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 8:29 ` pageexec
2010-09-10 8:59 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-11 13:30 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 19:33 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 22:35 ` pageexec
2010-09-08 11:57 ` Brad Spengler
2010-09-09 5:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-10 9:25 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-10 9:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-11 13:39 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 18:51 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 20:28 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 21:16 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 22:27 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 23:04 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-15 9:27 ` pageexec
2010-09-10 9:18 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] execve: improve interactivity with large arguments Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] execve: make responsive to SIGKILL " Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 3:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] execve argument-copying fixes KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 5:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] execve memory exhaust of " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 5:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] oom: don't ignore rss in nascent mm KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 22:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-10 9:39 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-10 9:57 ` [PATCH] move cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-10 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-16 5:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 5:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] execve: check the VM has enough memory at first KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-10 15:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-14 1:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-16 5:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-16 15:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-30 17:49 ` [PATCH] exec argument expansion can inappropriately trigger OOM-killer Solar Designer
2010-08-30 22:08 ` Brad Spengler
2010-08-31 11:53 ` Solar Designer
2010-08-31 11:56 ` [PATCH] exec argument expansion can inappropriately triggerOOM-killer Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100830091909.5248.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=oss-security@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®