From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oss-security@lists.openwall.com,
Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, pageexec@freemail.hu,
"Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
Eugene Teo" <eugene@redhat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] move cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:57:24 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100910101528.C958.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100909220504.GA6273@redhat.com>
> On 09/09, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1226,6 +1226,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> > int pdeath_signal; /* The signal sent when the parent dies */
> > /* ??? */
> > unsigned int personality;
> > + struct mm_struct *in_exec_mm;
>
> Oh, yes, this has to be per-thread (unlike ->mm, btw).
>
> I wonder if it makes sense to move ->cred_guard_mutex from task_struct
> to signal_struct and thus make multiple-threads-inside-exec impossible.
> Only one thread can win anyway.
Interesting idea, really.
I've thought
1) moving cread_guard_mutex itself
- no increase execve overhead
-> very good
- it also prevent parallel ptrace
-> probably no problem. nobody want parallel debugging
2) move in_exec_mm to signal_struct too
-> very hard. oom-killer can use very few lock because it's called
from various place. now both ->mm and ->in_exec_mm are protected
task_lock() and it help to avoid messy.
So, I've done only (1). I think this restriction effectivly prevent
some theorical execve() resouce smashing attack.
======================================================================
Subject: [PATCH] move cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct
Oleg Nesterov pointed out we have to prevent multiple-threads-inside-exec
itself and we can reuse ->cred_guard_mutex for it. Yes, concurrent execve()
has no worth.
Let's move ->cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct. It
naturally prevent multiple-threads-inside-exec.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 8 ++++----
fs/proc/base.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/init_task.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/sched.h | 7 ++++---
kernel/cred.c | 2 --
kernel/fork.c | 2 ++
kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++--
7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 81d0d06..052ed54 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1091,14 +1091,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(setup_new_exec);
*/
int prepare_bprm_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- if (mutex_lock_interruptible(¤t->cred_guard_mutex))
+ if (mutex_lock_interruptible(¤t->signal->cred_guard_mutex))
return -ERESTARTNOINTR;
bprm->cred = prepare_exec_creds();
if (likely(bprm->cred))
return 0;
- mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_guard_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(¤t->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ void free_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
free_arg_pages(bprm);
if (bprm->cred) {
- mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_guard_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(¤t->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
abort_creds(bprm->cred);
}
kfree(bprm);
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ void install_exec_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
* credentials; any time after this it may be unlocked.
*/
security_bprm_committed_creds(bprm);
- mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_guard_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(¤t->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(install_exec_creds);
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 55a16f2..fd97c8f 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ struct mm_struct *mm_for_maps(struct task_struct *task)
{
struct mm_struct *mm;
- if (mutex_lock_killable(&task->cred_guard_mutex))
+ if (mutex_lock_killable(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex))
return NULL;
mm = get_task_mm(task);
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ struct mm_struct *mm_for_maps(struct task_struct *task)
mmput(mm);
mm = NULL;
}
- mutex_unlock(&task->cred_guard_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
return mm;
}
@@ -2273,14 +2273,14 @@ static ssize_t proc_pid_attr_write(struct file * file, const char __user * buf,
goto out_free;
/* Guard against adverse ptrace interaction */
- length = mutex_lock_interruptible(&task->cred_guard_mutex);
+ length = mutex_lock_interruptible(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
if (length < 0)
goto out_free;
length = security_setprocattr(task,
(char*)file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name,
(void*)page, count);
- mutex_unlock(&task->cred_guard_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
out_free:
free_page((unsigned long) page);
out:
diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index 1f43fa5..ff3cc33 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ extern struct fs_struct init_fs;
.running = 0, \
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(sig.cputimer.lock), \
}, \
+ .cred_guard_mutex = \
+ __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(sig.cred_guard_mutex), \
}
extern struct nsproxy init_nsproxy;
@@ -139,8 +141,6 @@ extern struct cred init_cred;
.group_leader = &tsk, \
.real_cred = &init_cred, \
.cred = &init_cred, \
- .cred_guard_mutex = \
- __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(tsk.cred_guard_mutex), \
.comm = "swapper", \
.thread = INIT_THREAD, \
.fs = &init_fs, \
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index bb5bf3d..a7e7c2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -623,6 +623,10 @@ struct signal_struct {
int oom_adj; /* OOM kill score adjustment (bit shift) */
long oom_score_adj; /* OOM kill score adjustment */
+
+ struct mutex cred_guard_mutex; /* guard against foreign influences on
+ * credential calculations
+ * (notably. ptrace) */
};
/* Context switch must be unlocked if interrupts are to be enabled */
@@ -1293,9 +1297,6 @@ struct task_struct {
* credentials (COW) */
const struct cred *cred; /* effective (overridable) subjective task
* credentials (COW) */
- struct mutex cred_guard_mutex; /* guard against foreign influences on
- * credential calculations
- * (notably. ptrace) */
struct cred *replacement_session_keyring; /* for KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT */
char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; /* executable name excluding path
diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
index 9a3e226..a81833d 100644
--- a/kernel/cred.c
+++ b/kernel/cred.c
@@ -384,8 +384,6 @@ int copy_creds(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
struct cred *new;
int ret;
- mutex_init(&p->cred_guard_mutex);
-
if (
#ifdef CONFIG_KEYS
!p->cred->thread_keyring &&
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index b7e9d60..4c0d3ea 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -904,6 +904,8 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
sig->oom_adj = current->signal->oom_adj;
sig->oom_score_adj = current->signal->oom_score_adj;
+ mutex_init(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index f34d798..ac5013a 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task)
* under ptrace.
*/
retval = -ERESTARTNOINTR;
- if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&task->cred_guard_mutex))
+ if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex))
goto out;
task_lock(task);
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task)
unlock_tasklist:
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
unlock_creds:
- mutex_unlock(&task->cred_guard_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
out:
return retval;
}
--
1.6.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-10 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-27 22:02 [PATCH] exec argument expansion can inappropriately trigger OOM-killer Kees Cook
2010-08-30 0:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-08-30 0:56 ` Roland McGrath
2010-08-30 3:23 ` Solar Designer
2010-08-30 10:06 ` Roland McGrath
2010-08-30 19:48 ` Solar Designer
2010-08-31 0:40 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:34 ` [PATCH 0/3] execve argument-copying fixes Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] setup_arg_pages: diagnose excessive argument size Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 8:29 ` pageexec
2010-09-10 8:59 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-11 13:30 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 19:33 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 22:35 ` pageexec
2010-09-08 11:57 ` Brad Spengler
2010-09-09 5:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-10 9:25 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-10 9:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-11 13:39 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 18:51 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 20:28 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 21:16 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 22:27 ` pageexec
2010-09-14 23:04 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-15 9:27 ` pageexec
2010-09-10 9:18 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] execve: improve interactivity with large arguments Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 2:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] execve: make responsive to SIGKILL " Roland McGrath
2010-09-08 3:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] execve argument-copying fixes KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 5:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] execve memory exhaust of " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 5:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] oom: don't ignore rss in nascent mm KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 22:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-10 9:39 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-10 9:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-09-10 17:24 ` [PATCH] move cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-16 5:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-09 5:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] execve: check the VM has enough memory at first KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-10 15:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-09-14 1:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-16 5:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-16 15:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-30 17:49 ` [PATCH] exec argument expansion can inappropriately trigger OOM-killer Solar Designer
2010-08-30 22:08 ` Brad Spengler
2010-08-31 11:53 ` Solar Designer
2010-08-31 11:56 ` [PATCH] exec argument expansion can inappropriately triggerOOM-killer Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100910101528.C958.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eugene@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=oss-security@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®