From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 06:44:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010114459.GY14068@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101010104319.GA9862@elte.hu>
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:43:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 07:59:45AM -0500, Russ Anderson wrote:
> > > > Yes, Yinghai's patch fixes the problem.
> > > > Thank you very much.
> > >
> > > Will this be included in 2.6.36? It is needed for boot in order for UV
> > > systems to boot.
> >
> > -tip uses memblock APIs. If this happens with vanilla -git as well
> > then we need a bootmem backport for the fix.
>
> And to answer your question: yes, we can queue it up for -final as well
> if it's a recent regression - 'doesnt boot at all' bugs are nasty. But
> i'm not sure this is a bootmem problem so please double check vanilla
> v2.6.36-rc7 as well.
The 36-rc7 kernel does not boot at all either. I don't have any decent
debug tools to dig in further. It does fail on the same machine that
Russ was testing with, but passes on any that have a single blade as
the kernel Russ first identified as being a problem had. Based upon my
vague recollection of the boot messages, it appears to fail in a similar
point in boot. I would assume it is a similar problem.
Thanks,
Robin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-10 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-08 21:34 Russ Anderson
2010-10-08 21:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-08 22:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-10-08 22:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-10-09 12:59 ` Russ Anderson
2010-10-09 16:39 ` Robin Holt
2010-10-09 18:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-10-09 18:17 ` [PATCH -v2] x86, numa: Fix cross nodes memory configuration Yinghai Lu
2010-10-09 18:39 ` [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV Linus Torvalds
2010-10-10 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-10 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-10 11:44 ` Robin Holt [this message]
2010-10-10 11:56 ` Robin Holt
2010-10-10 14:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-10 22:51 ` Robin Holt
2010-10-11 2:52 ` [PATCH -v3] x86, numa: Fix cross nodes memory configuration Yinghai Lu
2010-10-11 22:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, numa: For each node, register the memory blocks actually used tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-10-11 22:05 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-11 22:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-11 22:28 ` tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-10-10 1:04 [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV Anvin, H Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101010114459.GY14068@sgi.com \
--to=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome