[PATCH -v2] x86, numa: Fix cross nodes memory configuration

[Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>]

Russ reported SGI UV is broken recently. He said:

| The SRAT table shows that memory range is spread over two nodes.
|
| SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 100000000-800000000
| SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 800000000-1000000000
| SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 1000000000-1080000000
|
|Previously, the kernel early_node_map[] would show three entries
|with the proper node.
|
|[    0.000000]     0: 0x00100000 -> 0x00800000
|[    0.000000]     1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000
|[    0.000000]     0: 0x01000000 -> 0x01080000
|
|The problem is recent community kernel early_node_map[] shows
|only two entries with the node 0 entry overlapping the node 1
|entry.
|
|    0: 0x00100000 -> 0x01080000
|    1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000

After looking at the changelog, Found out that it has been broken for a while by
following commit

|commit 8716273caef7f55f39fe4fc6c69c5f9f197f41f1
|Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
|Date:   Fri Sep 25 15:20:04 2009 -0700
|
|    x86: Export srat physical topology

Before that commit, register_active_regions() is called for every SRAT memory
entry right away.

Try to use nodememblk_range[] instead of nodes[].

For stable tree: from 2.6.33 to 2.3.36 need this patch by
changing memblock_x86_register_active_regions() to e820_register_active_regions()

Reported-by: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Tested-by: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

---
 arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -421,9 +421,11 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
-		memblock_x86_register_active_regions(i, nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
-						nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+	for (i = 0; i < num_node_memblks; i++)
+		memblock_x86_register_active_regions(memblk_nodeid[i],
+				node_memblk_range[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+				node_memblk_range[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
 	/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
 	sort_node_map();
 	if (!nodes_cover_memory(nodes)) {