From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] sched: hierarchical task accounting for FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:24:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101012075425.GG9893@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101012074910.GA9893@in.ibm.com>
sched: hierarchical task accounting for FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
From: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
With task entities participating in throttled sub-trees it is possible for
task activation/de-activation to not lead to root visible changes to
rq->nr_running. This in turn leads to incorrect idle and weight-per-task load
balance decisions.
To allow correct accounting we move responsibility for updating rq->nr_running
to the respective sched::classes. In the fair-group case this update is
hierarchical, tracking the number of active tasks rooted at each group entity.
Note: technically this issue also exists with the existing sched_rt
throttling; however due to the nearly complete provisioning of system
resources for rt scheduling this is much less common by default.
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 9 ++++++---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched_rt.c | 5 ++++-
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ struct task_group init_task_group;
/* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
struct cfs_rq {
struct load_weight load;
- unsigned long nr_running;
+ unsigned long nr_running, h_nr_tasks;
u64 exec_clock;
u64 min_vruntime;
@@ -1984,6 +1984,11 @@ static inline u64 sched_cfs_bandwidth_sl
#include "sched_stats.h"
+static void mod_nr_running(struct rq *rq, long delta)
+{
+ rq->nr_running += delta;
+}
+
static void inc_nr_running(struct rq *rq)
{
rq->nr_running++;
@@ -2040,7 +2045,6 @@ static void activate_task(struct rq *rq,
rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
- inc_nr_running(rq);
}
/*
@@ -2052,7 +2056,6 @@ static void deactivate_task(struct rq *r
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
- dec_nr_running(rq);
}
#include "sched_idletask.c"
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_child_runs_fir
*/
unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_sched_compat_yield;
+static void account_hier_tasks(struct sched_entity *se, int delta);
+
/*
* SCHED_OTHER wake-up granularity.
* (default: 1 msec * (1 + ilog(ncpus)), units: nanoseconds)
@@ -683,6 +685,40 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cf
se->on_rq = 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
+/* maintain hierarchal task counts on group entities */
+static void account_hier_tasks(struct sched_entity *se, int delta)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se));
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+
+ for_each_sched_entity(se) {
+ /* a throttled entity cannot affect its parent hierarchy */
+ if (group_cfs_rq(se) && cfs_rq_throttled(group_cfs_rq(se)))
+ break;
+
+ /* we affect our queuing entity */
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_tasks += delta;
+ }
+
+ /* account for global nr_running delta to hierarchy change */
+ if (!se)
+ mod_nr_running(rq, delta);
+}
+#else
+/*
+ * In the absence of group throttling, all operations are guaranteed to be
+ * globally visible at the root rq level.
+ */
+static void account_hier_tasks(struct sched_entity *se, int delta)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se));
+
+ mod_nr_running(rq, delta);
+}
+#endif
+
static void enqueue_sleeper(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
@@ -1099,6 +1135,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
}
+ account_hier_tasks(&p->se, 1);
hrtick_update(rq);
}
@@ -1124,6 +1161,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq
flags |= DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
}
+ account_hier_tasks(&p->se, -1);
hrtick_update(rq);
}
@@ -1197,6 +1235,8 @@ static u64 tg_request_cfs_quota(struct t
return delta;
}
+static void account_hier_tasks(struct sched_entity *se, int delta);
+
static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
struct sched_entity *se;
@@ -1214,6 +1254,7 @@ static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_r
if (!se->on_rq)
goto out_throttled;
+ account_hier_tasks(se, -cfs_rq->h_nr_tasks);
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
@@ -1244,6 +1285,7 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs
cfs_rq->throttled = 0;
cfs_rq->throttled_timestamp = 0;
+ account_hier_tasks(se, cfs_rq->h_nr_tasks);
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
if (se->on_rq)
break;
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -882,6 +882,8 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct ta
if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ inc_nr_running(rq);
}
static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
@@ -892,6 +894,8 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *r
dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ dec_nr_running(rq);
}
/*
@@ -1754,4 +1758,3 @@ static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_fi
rcu_read_unlock();
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 7:49 [PATCH v3 0/7] CFS Bandwidth Control Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 13:00 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-14 5:14 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-14 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 12:38 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-14 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-06 9:02 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 13:30 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-13 13:46 ` Nikhil Rao
2010-10-13 13:59 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-13 14:41 ` Nikhil Rao
2010-10-14 5:39 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-14 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:07 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:14 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:53 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:27 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:40 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 6:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-13 6:44 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-13 6:47 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 6:52 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-13 7:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-13 7:13 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-14 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 10:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-14 10:25 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 23:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-14 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:58 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-12 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Bharata B Rao
2010-10-15 4:45 ` Balbir Singh
2010-12-07 13:13 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:54 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2010-10-12 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] sched: Return/expire slack quota using generation counters Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 5:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] CFS Bandwidth Control KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-13 5:44 ` Herbert Poetzl
2010-10-13 6:26 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-17 8:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-11-19 3:24 ` Bharata B Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101012075425.GG9893@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome