From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Pete@jasper.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] CFS Bandwidth Control
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:54:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101119032440.GA3666@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CE3931D.1000403@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:32:29PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 03:49 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Its been a while since we posted CPS hard limits (aka CFS bandwidth control
> > now) patches, hence a quick recap first:
> >
> > - I have been working on CFS hard limits since last year and have posted
> > a few versions of the same (last post: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/5/44)
> > - Paul Turner and Nikhil Rao meanwhile started working on CFS bandwidth
> > control and have posted a couple of versions.
> > (last post v2: http://lwn.net/Articles/385055/)
> >
>
> Hi, All
>
> I tried it, it works very good! It adds a very useful feature.
> It is very helpful for virtualization or cloud-computing I think.
> I hope the next version patchset of it will be sent and get merged soon.
>
> When I tested it, my box became dead several times, infrequently, and
> I don't know how to reproduce it, but next steps may help to reproduce it:
>
> # mount -t cgroup -o cpu xxx /mnt
> # cd /mnt
> # mkdir test
> # cd test
> # echo 5000000 > cpu.cfs_period_us
> # echo 1000000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us
> # cat /dev/zero > /dev/null &
> # echo $! > tasks
> # #make the system busy, browse websites and open many tabs in your browser etc
> # #but do NOT do things important.
> # #after some time, the system may dead. (can not respond even you type AltSysrqC)
>
Hi Lai, Thanks for testing the patches. I haven't seen this behaviour still.
But will try out the steps you mention and see if I can reproduce it here.
Meanwhile if you find more information about the problem, do let us know.
Regards,
Bharata.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 7:49 Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 13:00 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-14 5:14 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-14 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 12:38 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-14 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-06 9:02 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 13:30 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-13 13:46 ` Nikhil Rao
2010-10-13 13:59 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-13 14:41 ` Nikhil Rao
2010-10-14 5:39 ` Balbir Singh
2010-10-14 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:07 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:14 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:53 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:27 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:40 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 6:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-13 6:44 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-13 6:47 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 6:52 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-13 7:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-13 7:13 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-14 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 10:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-14 10:25 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-14 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 23:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-14 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 9:58 ` Paul Turner
2010-10-12 7:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Bharata B Rao
2010-10-15 4:45 ` Balbir Singh
2010-12-07 13:13 ` Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] sched: hierarchical task accounting for FAIR_GROUP_SCHED Bharata B Rao
2010-10-12 7:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] sched: Return/expire slack quota using generation counters Bharata B Rao
2010-10-13 5:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] CFS Bandwidth Control KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-13 5:44 ` Herbert Poetzl
2010-10-13 6:26 ` Paul Turner
2010-11-17 8:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-11-19 3:24 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101119032440.GA3666@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Pete@jasper.es \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome