From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Cc: simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net, davem@davemloft.net,
"Matt Mackall" <mpm@selenic.com>,
adurbin@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chavey@google.com, "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
"Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/23] netconsole: Call netpoll_cleanup() in process context
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:33:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109193312.GA9990@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Dez6st660R3h+0uTqkTUgOppvzBXcbg7QqxDu@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:18:57AM -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:32:00PM -0800, Mike Waychison wrote:
> >> +static void deferred_netpoll_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
> >> +{
> >> + struct netconsole_target *nt;
> >> + unsigned long flags;
> >> +
> >> + nt = container_of(work, struct netconsole_target, cleanup_work);
> >> + netpoll_cleanup(&nt->np);
> >> +
> >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&target_list_lock, flags);
> >> + BUG_ON(nt->np_state != NETPOLL_CLEANING);
> >> + nt->np_state = NETPOLL_DISABLED;
> >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&target_list_lock, flags);
> >> +
> >> + netconsole_target_put(nt);
> >> +}
> >> +
> > Where is the synchronization on the new work queue when the module is getting
> > removed? The target get/put code does nothing to the module refcount, and
> > cleanup_netconsole just deletes targets, it doesn't block or fail on netconsole
> > refcounts, so you could run this work after the module has been removed and oops
> > the system.
> >
>
> The synchronization here is actually handled in free_param_target()
> with the call to cancel_work_sync(). After that call is made in the
> exit path, we know a task cannot be rescheduled for cleanup, so we can
> clean things up directly.
>
> The comment/name of free_param_target should probably change. I used
> to have this cancel_work_sync() call elsewhere, and folded both the
> dynamic and param-based target cleanup into one as they ended up being
> the same.
>
> Removal of the item from configfs however isn't handled.
>
> How about something like (no idea if this will get whitespace damage):
>
That would seem clearer to me yes. Thanks!
Neil
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index 02ba5c4..ddd5e4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -686,13 +686,16 @@ static void drop_netconsole_target(struct
> config_group *group,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&target_list_lock, flags);
>
> /*
> - * The target may have never been enabled, or was manually disabled
> - * before being removed so netpoll may have already been cleaned up.
> + * The target may have never been disabled, or was disabled due
> + * to a netdev event, but we haven't had the chance to clean
> + * things up yet.
> *
> - * If it queued for cleanup already, that is fine, as that path holds a
> - * reference to the config_item.
> + * We can't wait for the target to be cleaned up by its
> + * scheduled work however, as that work doesn't pin this module
> + * in place.
> */
> - if (nt->np_state == NETPOLL_ENABLED)
> + cancel_work_sync(&nt->cleanup_work);
> + if (nt->np_state == NETPOLL_ENABLED || nt->np-state == NETPOLL_CLEANING)
> netpoll_cleanup(&nt->np);
>
> config_item_put(&nt->item);
>
>
>
> I can fold this diff snippet into this patch for the next round if you
> agree it plugs the remaining hole.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 20:31 [PATCH v2 00/23] netoops support Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] netconsole: Remove unneeded reference counting Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] netconsole: Introduce locking over the netpoll fields Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] netconsole: Introduce 'enabled' state-machine Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] netconsole: Call netpoll_cleanup() in process context Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 12:07 ` Neil Horman
2010-11-09 17:18 ` Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 19:33 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] netconsole: Wrap the list and locking in a structure Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] netconsole: Push configfs_subsystem into netpoll_targets Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] netconsole: Move netdev_notifier " Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] netconsole: Split out netpoll_targets init/exit Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] netconsole: Add pointer to netpoll_targets Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] netconsole: Rename netconsole_target -> netpoll_target Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] netconsole: Abstract away the subsystem name Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] netpoll: Introduce netpoll_target configs Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 3:30 ` Américo Wang
2010-11-09 4:27 ` Américo Wang
2010-11-09 8:34 ` Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 9:06 ` Américo Wang
2010-11-09 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH] configfs: make it not be a module any more Américo Wang
2010-11-09 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] netpoll: Introduce netpoll_target configs Greg KH
2010-11-09 17:24 ` Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 17:27 ` Greg KH
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] netconsole: Move setting of default ports Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:32 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] netpoll: Move target code into netpoll_targets.c Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] Oops: Pass regs to oops_exit() Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] kmsg_dumper: Pass pt_regs along to dumpers Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] kmsg_dumper: Introduce a new 'SOFT' dump reason Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 5:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-09 5:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] sys-rq: Add option to soft dump Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 21:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-11-08 22:27 ` Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 22:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] netoops: add core functionality Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] netoops: Add x86 specific bits to packet headers Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 14:22 ` Neil Horman
2010-11-09 17:56 ` Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] netoops: Add user programmable fields to the netoops packet Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] netoops: Add one-shot mode Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] netoops: Add an interface to trigger various types of crashes Mike Waychison
2010-11-08 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] netoops support Matt Mackall
2010-11-08 21:20 ` David Miller
2010-11-08 21:43 ` Mike Waychison
2010-11-09 1:28 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-09 4:25 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109193312.GA9990@hmsreliant.think-freely.org \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=adurbin@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chavey@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®