From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: gerhard.wichert@ts.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix size checks for mmap() on /proc/bus/pci files (updated)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:44:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101110104434.6ed20d33@jbarnes-x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289383401-1357-1-git-send-email-martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:03:21 +0100
Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> The checks for valid mmaps of PCI resources made
> through /proc/bus/pci files that were introduced in
> 9eff02e2042f96fb2aedd02e032eca1c5333d767 have several problems:
>
> 1. mmap() calls on /proc/bus/pci files are made with real file
> offsets > 0, whereas under /sys/bus/pci/devices, the start of the
> resource corresponds to offset 0. This may lead to false negatives in
> pci_mmap_fits(), which implicitly assumes the /sys/bus/pci/devices
> layout.
>
> 2. The loop in proc_bus_pci_mmap doesn't skip empty resouces. This
> leads to false positives, because pci_mmap_fits() doesn't treat empty
> resources correctly (the calculated size is 1 <<
> (8*sizeof(resource_size_t)-PAGE_SHIFT) in this case!).
>
> 3. If a user maps resources with BAR > 0, pci_mmap_fits will emit
> bogus WARNINGS for the first resources that don't fit until the
> correct one is found.
>
> On many controllers the first 2-4 BARs are used, and the others are
> empty. In this case, an mmap attempt will first fail on the non-empty
> BARs (including the "right" BAR because of 1.) and emit bogus
> WARNINGS because of 3., and finally succeed on the first empty BAR
> because of 2. This is certainly not the intended behaviour.
>
> This patch addresses all 3 issues.
> Updated with an enum type for the additional parameter for
> pci_mmap_fits().
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
Thanks Martin, I'll push this into my for-linus branch for 2.6.37; may
as well cc: stable as well, since this is a long standing bug.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 8:38 [PATCH] fix size checks for mmap() on /proc/bus/pci files (resent) martin.wilck
2010-11-09 9:43 ` Martin Wilck
2010-11-09 16:42 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-11-10 10:03 ` [PATCH] fix size checks for mmap() on /proc/bus/pci files (updated) Martin Wilck
2010-11-10 18:44 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2010-11-10 19:29 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101110104434.6ed20d33@jbarnes-x201 \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=gerhard.wichert@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome