From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:30:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101216213005.GA5781@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292172499-21633-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 05:48:18PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> speedtch directly uses the internal timer and work members of a struct
> delayed_work. Use a separate work item and timer instead.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> Cc: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>
> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> This is part of a series to remove flush_scheduled_work() usage to
> prepare for deprecation of flush_scheduled_work(). Patches in this
> series are self contained and mostly straight-forward.
>
> Please feel free to take it into the appropriate tree, or just ack it.
> In the latter case, I'll merge the patch through the workqueue tree
> during the next merge window.
You forgot to add a "Signed-off-by:" on these patches, so I can't take
them in my tree :(
But feel free to add:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
to both 5/6 and 6/6 of this series and take them through your tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-16 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-12 16:48 [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] init: don't call flush_scheduled_work() from do_initcalls() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] ioc4: use static work_struct for ioc4_load_modules() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] media/video: explicitly flush request_module work Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] media/video: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 21:30 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-12-17 11:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] usb: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-17 13:51 ` speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-18 11:58 ` Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-18 16:32 ` [PATCH UPDATED 5/6] " Tejun Heo
2010-12-18 17:59 ` Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-24 15:14 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101216213005.GA5781@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=duncan.sands@free.fr \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome