From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 5/6] speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:32:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0CE22F.7090409@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217145117.75a28ae0@absol.kitzblitz>
speedtch directly uses the internal timer and work members of a struct
delayed_work. Use a separate work item and timer instead.
* Nicolas Kaiser discovered that timer init was missing. Fixed.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
---
Can you please test this one? Thanks.
drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: work/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
+++ work/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ struct speedtch_instance_data {
struct speedtch_params params; /* set in probe, constant afterwards */
- struct delayed_work status_checker;
+ struct timer_list status_check_timer;
+ struct work_struct status_check_work;
unsigned char last_status;
@@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ static void speedtch_check_status(struct
{
struct speedtch_instance_data *instance =
container_of(work, struct speedtch_instance_data,
- status_checker.work);
+ status_check_work);
struct usbatm_data *usbatm = instance->usbatm;
struct atm_dev *atm_dev = usbatm->atm_dev;
unsigned char *buf = instance->scratch_buffer;
@@ -575,11 +576,11 @@ static void speedtch_status_poll(unsigne
{
struct speedtch_instance_data *instance = (void *)data;
- schedule_delayed_work(&instance->status_checker, 0);
+ schedule_work(&instance->status_check_work);
/* The following check is racy, but the race is harmless */
if (instance->poll_delay < MAX_POLL_DELAY)
- mod_timer(&instance->status_checker.timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(instance->poll_delay));
+ mod_timer(&instance->status_check_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(instance->poll_delay));
else
atm_warn(instance->usbatm, "Too many failures - disabling line status polling\n");
}
@@ -595,7 +596,7 @@ static void speedtch_resubmit_int(unsign
if (int_urb) {
ret = usb_submit_urb(int_urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!ret)
- schedule_delayed_work(&instance->status_checker, 0);
+ schedule_work(&instance->status_check_work);
else {
atm_dbg(instance->usbatm, "%s: usb_submit_urb failed with result %d\n", __func__, ret);
mod_timer(&instance->resubmit_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(RESUBMIT_DELAY));
@@ -624,7 +625,7 @@ static void speedtch_handle_int(struct u
}
if ((count == 6) && !memcmp(up_int, instance->int_data, 6)) {
- del_timer(&instance->status_checker.timer);
+ del_timer(&instance->status_check_timer);
atm_info(usbatm, "DSL line goes up\n");
} else if ((count == 6) && !memcmp(down_int, instance->int_data, 6)) {
atm_info(usbatm, "DSL line goes down\n");
@@ -640,7 +641,7 @@ static void speedtch_handle_int(struct u
if ((int_urb = instance->int_urb)) {
ret = usb_submit_urb(int_urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
- schedule_delayed_work(&instance->status_checker, 0);
+ schedule_work(&instance->status_check_work);
if (ret < 0) {
atm_dbg(usbatm, "%s: usb_submit_urb failed with result %d\n", __func__, ret);
goto fail;
@@ -686,7 +687,7 @@ static int speedtch_atm_start(struct usb
}
/* Start status polling */
- mod_timer(&instance->status_checker.timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+ mod_timer(&instance->status_check_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
return 0;
}
@@ -698,7 +699,7 @@ static void speedtch_atm_stop(struct usb
atm_dbg(usbatm, "%s entered\n", __func__);
- del_timer_sync(&instance->status_checker.timer);
+ del_timer_sync(&instance->status_check_timer);
/*
* Since resubmit_timer and int_urb can schedule themselves and
@@ -869,10 +870,11 @@ static int speedtch_bind(struct usbatm_d
usbatm->flags |= (use_isoc ? UDSL_USE_ISOC : 0);
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&instance->status_checker, speedtch_check_status);
+ INIT_WORK(&instance->status_check_work, speedtch_check_status);
+ init_timer(&instance->status_check_timer);
- instance->status_checker.timer.function = speedtch_status_poll;
- instance->status_checker.timer.data = (unsigned long)instance;
+ instance->status_check_timer.function = speedtch_status_poll;
+ instance->status_check_timer.data = (unsigned long)instance;
instance->last_status = 0xff;
instance->poll_delay = MIN_POLL_DELAY;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-18 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-12 16:48 [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] init: don't call flush_scheduled_work() from do_initcalls() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] ioc4: use static work_struct for ioc4_load_modules() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] media/video: explicitly flush request_module work Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] media/video: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Tejun Heo
2010-12-16 21:30 ` Greg KH
2010-12-17 11:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 16:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] usb: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-17 13:51 ` speedtch: don't abuse struct delayed_work Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-18 11:58 ` Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-18 16:32 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-12-18 17:59 ` [PATCH UPDATED 5/6] " Nicolas Kaiser
2010-12-24 15:14 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: another assorted flush_scheduled_work() removals Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0CE22F.7090409@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=duncan.sands@free.fr \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikai@nikai.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome