mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <me@felipebalbi.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl4030-irq: implement bus_*lock
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:28:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101229122808.GC2222@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293583108.1822.3.camel@eowin>

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:38:28AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 23:58 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:14:19PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> > +static void twl4030_sih_bus_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct sih_agent        *agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
>> > +
>> > +       mutex_unlock(&agent->irq_lock);
>> > +}
>>
>> I suspect you need to do some sort of sync with the hardware here - the
>> _sync bit of the name comes from the fact that the mask and unmask stuff
>> is still called with IRQs disabled and so can't touch and I2C chip, this
>> is called after reenabling them give a chance for the updates done to
>> be reflected in the hardware.  The implementation everyone else has done
>> is to update a register cache in the other functions then write that
>> out here before dropping the mutex.
>
>now that I look at some gpio chips I see what you're saying, will update
>that tomorrow. Thanks

I believe you meant something like below, I'll get back to this in a
little while. Have lots to test:

 From f15801a5d57041b7669222bdb7cccf8b592c2f63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:07:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl4030-irq: implement bus_*lock
Organization: Texas Instruments\n

drop all the locking around mask/unmask and
implement bus_lock and bus_sync_unlock methods.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
---
  drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c |  101 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
  1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
index 298956d..84f6066 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
@@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ struct sih_agent {
  	const struct sih	*sih;
  
  	u32			imr;
+	bool			imr_change_pending;
  	u32			edge_change;
  
  	struct mutex		irq_lock;
@@ -450,64 +451,23 @@ struct sih_agent {
  static void twl4030_sih_mask(unsigned irq)
  {
  	struct sih_agent	*agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	const struct sih	*sih = agent->sih;
-
-	union {
-		u8	bytes[4];
-		u32	word;
-	}			imr;
-
-	int			status;
  
  	agent->imr |= BIT(irq - agent->irq_base);
-
-	mutex_lock(&agent->irq_lock);
-
-	/* byte[0] gets overwritten as we write ... */
-	imr.word = cpu_to_le32(agent->imr << 8);
-
-	/* write the whole mask ... simpler than subsetting it */
-	status = twl_i2c_write(sih->module, imr.bytes,
-			sih->mask[irq_line].imr_offset, sih->bytes_ixr);
-	if (status)
-		pr_err("twl4030: %s, %s --> %d\n", __func__,
-				"write", status);
-	mutex_unlock(&agent->irq_lock);
+	agent->imr_change_pending = true;
  }
  
  static void twl4030_sih_unmask(unsigned irq)
  {
  	struct sih_agent	*agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	const struct sih	*sih = agent->sih;
  
-	union {
-		u8	bytes[4];
-		u32	word;
-	}			imr;
-
-	int			status;
-
-	mutex_lock(&agent->irq_lock);
  	agent->imr &= ~BIT(irq - agent->irq_base);
-
-	/* byte[0] gets overwritten as we write ... */
-	imr.word = cpu_to_le32(agent->imr << 8);
-
-	/* write the whole mask ... simpler than subsetting it */
-	status = twl_i2c_write(sih->module, imr.bytes,
-			sih->mask[irq_line].imr_offset, sih->bytes_ixr);
-	if (status)
-		pr_err("twl4030: %s, %s --> %d\n", __func__,
-				"write", status);
-	mutex_unlock(&agent->irq_lock);
+	agent->imr_change_pending = true;
  }
  
  static int twl4030_sih_set_type(unsigned irq, unsigned trigger)
  {
  	struct sih_agent	*agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
-	const struct sih	*sih = agent->sih;
  	struct irq_desc		*desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
-	int			status = 0;
  
  	if (!desc) {
  		pr_err("twl4030: Invalid IRQ: %d\n", irq);
@@ -517,17 +477,57 @@ static int twl4030_sih_set_type(unsigned irq, unsigned trigger)
  	if (trigger & ~(IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
  		return -EINVAL;
  
-	mutex_lock(&agent->irq_lock);
  	if ((desc->status & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) != trigger) {
-		u8			bytes[6];
-		u32			edge_change;
+		agent->edge_change |= BIT(irq - agent->irq_base);
  
  		desc->status &= ~IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
  		desc->status |= trigger;
-		agent->edge_change |= BIT(irq - agent->irq_base);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void twl4030_sih_bus_lock(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	struct sih_agent	*agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+
+	mutex_lock(&agent->irq_lock);
+}
+
+static void twl4030_sih_bus_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq)
+{
+	struct sih_agent	*agent = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
+	const struct sih	*sih = agent->sih;
+
+	int			status;
+
+	union {
+		u8	bytes[4];
+		u32	word;
+	}			imr;
+
+	if (agent->imr_change_pending) {
+		/* byte[0] gets overwritten as we write ... */
+		imr.word = cpu_to_le32(agent->imr << 8);
+
+		/* write the whole mask ... simpler than subsetting it */
+		status = twl_i2c_write(sih->module, imr.bytes,
+				sih->mask[irq_line].imr_offset, sih->bytes_ixr);
+		if (status)
+			pr_err("twl4030: %s, %s --> %d\n", __func__,
+					"write", status);
+		agent->imr_change_pending = false;
+	}
+
+	if (agent->edge_change) {
+		u32			edge_change;
+		u8			bytes[6];
+
  		edge_change = agent->edge_change;
+		agent->edge_change = 0;
  
-		/* Read, reserving first byte for write scratch.  Yes, this
+		/*
+		 * Read, reserving first byte for write scratch.  Yes, this
  		 * could be cached for some speedup ... but be careful about
  		 * any processor on the other IRQ line, EDR registers are
  		 * shared.
@@ -550,7 +550,6 @@ static int twl4030_sih_set_type(unsigned irq, unsigned trigger)
  			if (!d) {
  				pr_err("twl4030: Invalid IRQ: %d\n",
  						i + agent->irq_base);
-				status = -ENODEV;
  				goto out;
  			}
  
@@ -576,8 +575,6 @@ static int twl4030_sih_set_type(unsigned irq, unsigned trigger)
  
  out:
  	mutex_unlock(&agent->irq_lock);
-
-	return status;
  }
  
  static struct irq_chip twl4030_sih_irq_chip = {
@@ -585,6 +582,8 @@ static struct irq_chip twl4030_sih_irq_chip = {
  	.mask		= twl4030_sih_mask,
  	.unmask		= twl4030_sih_unmask,
  	.set_type	= twl4030_sih_set_type,
+	.bus_lock	= twl4030_sih_bus_lock,
+	.bus_sync_unlock = twl4030_sih_bus_sync_unlock,
  };
  
  /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-- 
1.7.3.4.598.g85356

-- 
balbi

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-29 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-28 13:59 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Move twl*-irq.c to threaded_irq infrastructure Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 13:59 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl6030-irq: move to threaded_irq Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 15:46   ` Mark Brown
2010-12-28 16:16     ` Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 17:14       ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] TWL4030 IRQ Changes Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 17:14         ` [RFC/PATCH 1/3] mfd: twl4030-irq: move to threaded_irq Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 17:14         ` [RFC/PATCH 2/3] mfd: twl4030-irq: drop the workqueue hackery Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 17:14         ` [RFC/PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl4030-irq: implement bus_*lock Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 23:58           ` Mark Brown
2010-12-29  0:38             ` Felipe Balbi
2010-12-29 12:28               ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2010-12-30 12:18                 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-30 12:26                   ` Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 17:36         ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] TWL4030 IRQ Changes Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 17:41           ` Mark Brown
2010-12-29  0:39             ` Felipe Balbi
2010-12-28 17:40     ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] mfd: twl6030-irq: move to threaded_irq David Brownell
2010-12-28 17:45       ` Mark Brown
2010-12-28 13:59 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] mfd: twl4030-irq: " Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101229122808.GC2222@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®